> 4chan is down because of DDoS attacks, stemming from a bunch of guys that are angry that moot doesn't want to move #4chan to lulznet.
-Kirtaner (of 420chan).
No real reasons to distrust this information, really. Let's hope it didn't hit 'em too hard. I must say, with the traffic that 4chan get, it must have been one fucking tidal wave of a DDOS.
i feel like like someone froze The Nile, lifted it out of its river bed, and plunged it into the heart of pedobear
that is how i feel right nao
fortunately i went through this many times before so i know it'll be back, that kind of softens the blow
wait, if its dos, doesnt that mean everything is ok? i would be far more worried if someone snuck a baddie onboard
>>200
Signed. Rest assured, the people who need that kind of info have it already at this point. The rest of us are only going to cause trouble by getting involved.
i wanna /b/ack
So this is how 4chan dies? After all those donate-or-die drives when it was in danger of running out of money, being watched by the fucking US governmet for "terrorism", and attacking Scientology, this is it? A bunch of nerdy faggots DDOS'ing 4chan is what brings it down? What the FUCK?
>>204
is this the 12th or 13th time 4chan has died? or did i miss a few times?
Sigh, without /ck/ I'm stuck to making ice cream and cereal :|
>>205
Major (like this one) or minor (a few hours)?
I can recall around 4-5 major downs, and countless minor ones.
>>204
Um, this isn't even the first time this has happened in the past year - "brb, soup" ring a bell? 4chan has a major outage every six months or so. IIRC, this is at least the fourth major outage just since /b/day, and they were even more common in the time before that.
Calm down. Quit being so melodramatic. This too shall pass.
>>208
still annoying as hell though. I just want to go back and lurk around /k/ while i'm bored and there's nothing good on. Need to fill my time with other useless crap I guess.
Anyone think that Gaia did it?
>>211
NO. LURK THE FUCK MOAR.
At least read the damned thread, FFS.
It was a bunch of bored script kiddies from raidchan trying to start a -chan war. The people who need to deal with this are doing so already. End of story.
Gaia doesn't do raids, and even if they did aren't capable of DDoS attacks. Your typical Gaia user doesn't know what a botnet is.
What's most fucking annoying is the fact every single paranoid 13 year old is going to go around blaming everyone else and raiding them even when the smoking cock is already out there. Fuck, I hope /b/ dies. Sure, everyone else will feel the backlash but their Ritalin-addled "brains" will grow weary of it soon enough and gb2/gaia/myspace/etc.
is the ddos attack still running?
this reminds me about last year, same days (21 july - 24 july).
im still reading the IRC logs (yes im
curious, so what? >_< ) of those MOTHERF***ING BASTARDS and it looks like they're only tryin to have their 3 days of glory.
They're nothing more than bored kids, they're only pretending to be ANONSOLDIERS OF LIBERTY.
There is no real reason to DOS attack a TOTALLY FREE IMAGE BOARD, also birthplace of the most of the internet culture.
The only reason is FAGGOTRY.
And shit.
And cocks.
My engrish is crap.
218 GET!
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>And don't forget 4nont4lk has been spamming 4chan's /b/ for a while too.
Looks to me like tactics, blamegame. I guess the several attempts were probably connected: first the shitpasta using the idiots to spam the site, later spambots. They use the persistent weakness of the site, for which we anyway need a lasting solution, I would say something like a soft version of r9k for all the boards.
I for once enjoy the free time to sort my images and get some sleep in the hours normal people get it. And wow, there is outside, raining though, shit.
>>219
how about an obligatory tripcode registration?
>>219,220
how about an obligatory same person?
once 4chan comes back up those who are guilty will surely face the true wrath of anon. it won't be pretty. in the past, whatever site tried to spam /b/ got shitflooded and killed. it just turned out that 4nont4lk was a bit stronger, and so survived the initial attack. but they shall fall too, eventually. anon won't miss the opportunity to once again show that trying to get attention to your site from /b/ will result in much more attention than you wanted.
>how about an obligatory same person?
That's about the same, realised by tripcode, even you could see the advantage.
>once 4chan comes back up those who are guilty will surely face the true wrath of anon. it won't be pretty. in the past, whatever site tried to spam /b/ got shitflooded and killed. it just turned out that 4nont4lk was a bit stronger, and so survived the initial attack. but they shall fall too, eventually. anon won't miss the opportunity to once again show that trying to get attention to your site from /b/ will result in much more attention than you wanted.
Pure raidcancer faggotry. "Anon is legion, anon nevar forgets!" (meaning: look at me I'm pathetic with the mind of a 13 year old, Hollywood movies like Fightclub and V for Vendetta determine my worldview)
Everybody who wants a personal army can easily manipulate faggots like you: one spambot is enough.
Enjoy your aids, fail and v&.
/b/ suck less at becoming a tool that destroys your own site plz
Fuck /b/, I want the rest of the site back!
Did anyone call the "MAYBE HIS HOUSE" number?
I, for one, will enjoy organizing raids on our attackers once 4chan is back up.
Inb4 personal army, raidcancer, etc.
I do it for the lulz
i just want the other fucking boards, i can go to other forums/chans but its different from 4chan, i dont know.........
any raidfags care to give us any inside info?
>>226
NO MORE GODDAMN RAIDS, FFS!
That's what caused this shit in the first place. People like you are why /b/ is such utter FAIL now. Raids don't deal with this kind of thing, they just lead to more raids, and the cycle never ends. I'll say it again, "LET THE BIG BOYS DEAL WITH IT." Instead of going off half-cocked, and hitting every possible perpetrator you can think of with your petty, little, half-assed raids; let the adepts, who actually know who they are after, and who know how to make it really hurt, do their thing. DDoS leads to serious RL business - it's not for kids.
tl;dl JUST FUCKING CHILL, GODDAMN IT!
>>230 So question... Where did you get the idea that you're more of a "big boy" than me?
>>231 From the fact he weighs 400+ pounds. I'd say that's a pretty good indicator, wouldn't you?
ddos'ing 4chan is like spitting into a wasps nest. yeah you get a couple of the fuckers covered in saliva, but that smug grin on your face is quickly wiped off by a cloud of angry, stinging madness. and all you can do is roll on the ground screaming in agony while they turn you into a swollen pink blob.
>>230
the internetz are turning into isreal sect with moar jews
It wasn't YTMND, and it wasn't Ebaums. If it was YTMND, there would be a flood of YTMNDs made about it flooding their homepage. It couldn't be Ebaums because they're retarded.
TIDUS
>>234
Wait, more? I thought we were already full of jews...
(<-- is jewish)
>>231
I'm not. Never said I was. I said to let them do "their" work - third person, not first.
Unlike you, I've been around the "big boys" enough, and know enough about them, to know that I'm not one of them. For starters, the big boys are not posting about responding with raids, and certainly not on iichan of all places. This is beyond raids, we're talking RL shit going down at this point. I know enough to stay out of the way of that, do you?
>>235
Read the thread. It's raidchan. IRC logs don't lie. Besides which, DDoS isn't YTMND or ebaums' style any more than it's Gaia's.
> IRC logs don't lie.
<moot> i just raped a 6-year-old girlit was in an IRC log so it must be true!
i called "viral"'s number, and he spent the night calling me back on restricted.
Just did a lulzy youtube video on Biaso getting hauled off to prison.
Shit. Still down.
So how many days has it been?
Is 4 Chan really getting DDOS'd or is it something else?
If they are the fucker doing it must be really pissed off at 4 Chan for some reason to be able to keep this up for this long.
I found myself getting wound up by this then it hit me. I was getting wound up by something that has no physical entity. Beyond your computer screen, 4chan has pretty much zero relevance to anything whatsoever. When you are not at your computer then 4chan ceases to exist. So why get wound up by it?
Hmmm. Piratebay is down now too.
Methinks ACTA is coming...
>DDoS isn't YTMND or ebaums' style any more than it's Gaia's.
Someone missed the Internet World War of 2006, but needless to say, it wasn't them.
>>239
One of the IRC logs is over a thousand lines long. It could be fake, but I strongly doubt it.
>>242
It's been down since 2:00 AM eastern on Monday
http://status.4chan.org/
>>245
it's really not that hard to add a few lines to an existing log.
fuck, it was up, but now is down again WHAT THE FUCK! I WANT /a/ BACK GODDAMNIT
>Someone missed the Internet World War of 2006
That was pretty lame, though: just a bunch of poorly-coordinated, weak, individual DoS attempts. No botnets = not true DDoS.
>One of the IRC logs is over a thousand lines long. It could be fake, but I strongly doubt it.
Exactly: it's too elaborate to be fake. I didn't mean to imply that lies are never told on IRC, but merely that the conversations recorded in an authentic IRC log are pretty good evidence of what transpired.
>Read the log: it's not a matter of "a few lines."
>>251
The problem is that made-up (or even embellished) logs always come out looking composed. This one has details people trying to fake it always forget. It doesn't look composed.
>>252
never say always.
i'm not saying this one is fake, i'm just saying that things like this are easy to fake, so an IRC log is not really any kind of reliable evidence at all.
I want /a/ back!
it's almost geass sunday :(
>>253
I don't entirely disagree, except for the "easy" part. They're easy enough to fake, but not easy to fake well. That means that they usually are reasonably reliable evidence.
I might add, that, in this case, the skiddie from raidchan that was at the center of the thing (pacifico) has acknowledged (on youtube) the authenticity of the log at this point, though he persists in disputing his or raidchan's role in the attack (he claims, among other things, that their attack lasted for only ten minutes, that it didn't involve a botnet, and that they don't have capability for the 3-5Gb attack moot referred to).
>>254
It was back for quite a bit earlier, but now it's down again.
>>255,252
I've been ruminating over the logs a bit, and they certainly do look authentic on the first glance, but there's still something about them that's unsettling, particularly the timestamps.
pacifico is a teenager, and as most teenagers are, loves attention. While it's disputable whether he played a central role in the attack, he certainly wanted to be. Maybe he did launch some minor attacks, but I also doubt he has that big of a botnet -- raidchan as their name implies has attempted DDoSes on other sites in the past, but they've never managed much bandwidth.
poor 4 chan. Dam DDoS according to moots blog
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
"The site is still down due to an ongoing DDoS attack.
Remember kids: DDoS is cruise control for cool.
UPDATE: Well, we're still down. Unfortunately, there is very little (read: nothing) that can be done about a 3-5Gbit DDoS attack."
by moot @ 12:32 AM
http://wakaba.c3.cx/soc/kareha.pl/1214538141/17
What do you make of this?
I want my /B!!!!!!!!
>>256
>>258
I don't know. There's a lot of confusion right now, as there seems to be a consensus that this can't all be raidchan's doing - if they have this kind of capability, then they've been seriously holding out during previous raids. Nobody seems to know what's going on with certainty.
This is getting serious, though, because an outage of this duration is the type of thing that site owners usually involve the FBI over (and moot has done that before).
can we make this thread /b/?
>>260
lol wishful thinking much? FBI could care less about 4chan, hell they'd probably welcome this, considering all the shit it's given to them already.
>>263
Normally, yes, but I suspect they are going to take pretty seriously anyone who has the capability of this level of DDoS attack, regardless of the target. 3-5Gb directed at one site is pretty big (and given that they are hitting multiple sites at once, their capacity is even greater).
Even though they find 4chan distasteful (and in point of fact, they mostly find it inane, rather than threatening), they have a legal obligation to uphold the law, and, at any rate, they are not likely to want to leave a threat on the loose who could conceivably turn its attention to more problematic targets. What do you think the political repercussions would be if some "legitimate" site got hit by the same perpetrator(s) down the road, only to find out the FBI could have done something earlier, but didn't "because they were only hitting -chan sites?"
In this era when the authorities take every incident of cyber-crime pretty seriously, these people are asking for a visit from the partyvan.
"What do you think the political repercussions would be if some "legitimate" site got hit by the same perpetrator(s) down the road, only to find out the FBI could have done something earlier"
9/11 would happen. oh shi...
for the douche bags talking bad about /b/ suck a big one! all i have to say is raptor jesus is judging you wryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!
oh and i heard you like mudkips!
mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkimudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip
mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip mudkip!
p.s this is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q & R where eliminalted!
I miss /rs/... :(
I want /toy/ back ;o;
IT WAS CLOUD'S FAULT
AND WILL SMITH, AND CHRONOS
This place is full of fail and aids on great levels. I am disappointed, yet not surprised.
Also, cocks.
Needs moar pooper.
niggers
Anyone else think moot might be using the DDOS as an excuse to finally give up? Think about it, in the Time interview he's expressed his frustration over the difficulty in running the site with barely enough money to pay for it, and that stupid cat site making 3 million bucks while he gets nothing at all might be the final straw for him. Added with the incresingly negative publicity and how problematic /b/ has gotten over the past 2 years, and, well...maybe it's time to give up.
Considering all the shit that the site has gone through over the past 5 years, it's more surprising that it even lasted that long. Now that it's too popular, and subsequently too expensive to run, the DDOS is the perfect excuse to shut it down for good. The blame for the site's downfall gets shifted to someone else, while moot can simply sneak out the back door and no one will ever blame him. The end?
>>274
I doubt it. He had just announced that new features and changes to improve the site were coming soon. While some might argue that death would be the biggest improvement of all for 4chan, I don't think moot really feels that way. He actually has been very annoyed about the whole "moot hates 4chan," idea floating around.
If, OTOH, you think he might simply not be exerting maximum effort to get the site back up as quickly as possible - sort of using the opportunity to relax a bit - then you might be on to something. He certainly doesn't take the site as seriously as some of the users do (which I would argue is a sign that he is still sane).
well i dont care about /b/ that much as i care for the other boards..
DDOSing 4chan, like pissing in an ocean of OH SHI-
i miss /k/ so hard. Ive even resorted to airshit forums :'(
It was probably because Alan Moore found out that the kids wearing the V for Vendetta mask weren't fans of his book, just idiots from -chans.
Don't fuck with Alan Moore.
>>278
http://kei.iichan.net/guns/wakaba.html
Several /k/ regulars are there. But unfortunately, without any gun noobs or liberal gun banners, there's practically nothing to talk about at all.
I don't care for shit like /b/ etc.
He should just keep the porn and /x/ (for lulz) and i'll be happy as a fuck.
I fucking miss 4chan like shit. Especially /x/. With all the bullshitty horror. That was the only place I visited. For all that creepypasta shit. 7chan doesn't even begin to compare to 4chan.
I miss my /mu/ ._.
So....any ideas when those fuckers might give it up?
Seriously, are they that butthurt towards an imageboard they have to put this much effort into their bitching?
Seriously, where am I gonna discuss /co/mic Con?
Firefox says Animu & Mango is still my most visited. Dammit.
srs lolz killing here, net needs lest skiddies.
And nothing of value was lost
>>284
They have nothing else to do since their lives are meaningless and spent all day in the chat room.
who gives a flying fuck if failchan is down? just go an hero you faggots
Maybe scientology f final fighting back.
thank about it, how much trafic dose 4chan get, and how many computers would you need to ddos the site, to get it down for so long ?
Scientology, have bothe the money to invest in all the coputer, or they can get all there followers to do it, and they have a motiv to do so, 4chan did it to them
but ehh its just like .. my opining
>>290
why don't you pack some more retarded memes into your sentences faggot
Well, I want my 4chan back >( 7chan smells bad
shit. /k/ should be in Rhodesia by now. ffs.
"Sunday, July 27, 2008
We're aiming to have the site back online later tonight (EST).
Hope you've enjoyed your vacation!
by moot @ 4:49 PM "
HURRAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!1
So how long will it be up before your down again?
Also, Piratebay is down....again.
so what are we doing with the splitting of /b/ is it happeninG?