The Legendary Next Update (365)
30 Name: !tFiTnDB9dg 2005-10-14 00:56 ID:Heaven
testing #`¦
131 Name: &height=16)
2005-10-18 17:35 ID:gBva8ggI
That form just looks wrong with no title or clear separator, though. I might put in a title that is not the exact same as the button, though. Any suggestions?
The board title is inserted by template.pl, and rules.html is included after it.
285 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-23 18:38 ID:Heaven
HTML mode handles >> references, but not URLs because I've been too lazy to figure out a regexp that would handle that correctly. Also, yes, newlines are converted to <br /> intentionally. This matches how most sites that accept HTML markup work.
100 Name: 2005-10-17 14:52 ID:gBva8ggI
Well, that's what I've said from the start, but people keep requesting them.
FUDGE_BLOCKQUOTES is used by the Futaba style, and I guess I just want to keep it there to make it compatible with Futallaby-style CSS files.
73 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-17 08:21 ID:Heaven
>>71
forgot to add that turning the CSS selector and Admin functions into drop-down menus and moving them to the right side of board and thread title headers would remove that top bar entirely on the front page.
116 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-10-18 03:53 ID:Heaven
What does "fusianasan" mean?
347 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-27 16:57 ID:Heaven
Thanks. I did it the hard way and put in the proper transformations everywhere so filenames can be kept intact, though.
167 Name: 2005-10-19 18:55 ID:gBva8ggI
Oh:
> Getting back to inconsequential nitpicking: I find the "___ image replies omitted" phrase to be a bit redundant, and for one it confuses me as to whether or not those image replies are separate from text-only replies. How about simply calling it "images"?
Yes, that's a great idea, which is why I've always done just that. You're thinking of 4chan.
294 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-23 20:38 ID:Heaven
You don't see the link to the WakabaMark page either?
> I am just guessing here, but I am pretty sure most people will only change their settings in very rare cases.
I just added the Text Art mode so that people could post AA on any board and have it work right, but the only way for that to work is if you can quickly change modes between posts.
Look, it's getting just a tiny bit annoying with the complaining. I've been putting a huge amount of effort into making this work well both for those who want markup and those who don't. If you don't like it, you turn it off and don't need to bother with it again. There's just a tiny little link there to let people do this. Is this really a such a huge bother to deal with? It's *two words*.
206 Name: 205 2005-10-21 03:39 ID:Heaven
Congratulations to 82.94.251.206!
So the subject line will look like this:
[username]<><>[unix timestamp from now]<>[content of comment box]<> <>[IP]
236 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-21 22:34 ID:Heaven
In mode_image: shouldn't the board title be in <h1>, and the post headers in <h2>?
93 Name: anon!21anon4H3U 2005-10-17 14:00 ID:Heaven
>>91 Ohshi-, time paradox!
206 Name: 205 2005-10-21 03:39 ID:Heaven
Congratulations to 82.94.251.206!
So the subject line will look like this:
[username]<><>[unix timestamp from now]<>[content of comment box]<> <>[IP]
76 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-17 08:46 ID:Heaven
>>74
The comma range separator is useful for anchoring a certain post range to the first post (ie, "1,-100"), but that's all I can really think of. Still, I appreciate such a degree of flexibility.
333 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-26 20:33 ID:y5Ya7L3/
>>327-328
All of this would be better handled by an external application. I think you are putting way too much work into user gimmicks as it is.
More options means putting more buttons, links, etc. into the interface. I am still bothered by the "More options...", but I am just a text purist (doing my fair share of AA, though) anyway, so meh meh... ( ´･ω･｀)
59 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-16 21:22 ID:Heaven
I was browsing through some old threads and now they're all gone. :(
205 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-21 03:15 ID:Heaven
If we must discuss Shiichan's bug (which I believe we don't): I like the one where it sometimes turns an existing thread at the end of the All thread list into a thread with no subject, creation date set as 31 Dec 1969: 19:00 and then set to -1 posts (!) - and when you post in it, you 0GET and your IP appears as the subject.
It's a brilliant, better than fusianasan! Try it out: http://dis.4chan.org/read.php/dis/1121735647/
132 Name: c-24-91-21-117.hsd1.ma.comcast.net 2005-10-18 17:36 ID:z/kxsMjQ
test1
160 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-19 14:51 ID:Heaven
>>157
So the functions need to be hardcoded to a post element one way or another? If I wanted to, let's say, create a template for gazo-box or Shiichan (both use checkboxes for sage), I'd need to slightly modify kareha.pl to check that new checkbox input instead of the Link string input?
An interesting limitation. Thanks for explaining.
About permasaging/deleting after a certain thread filesize is reached: would this be the same as a limit on the total number of characters in a thread? Or would we also include WakabaMark formatting, hyperlinks (including navigation), name/date/title headers, reply boxes, and non-Unicode characters in the formula?
>>158
Chances are that most if not all major/fundamental changes made to Kareha's core scripts will clash with the philosophy of most people here (including WAHa), and they won't care for them anyway. There really aren't all that many big-bang end-user features left to be implemented in Kareha before it loses its minimalist charm.
P.S. Reminder for >>85
174 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-20 02:03 ID:Heaven
> Making them configurable from site to site is really dumb, because it would create an unthinkable usability mess.
Why? Let people figure out things themselves, if they are so keen on changing their keywords. They can get together in their own webmaster threads and figure this out. I don't see why this should be solved here.
Of course I think this is a dumb idea in the first place. Nobody needs to know what fusianasan and sage are. Write a FAQ with two sentences about it and/or let your oldtime users tell newbies. Two frickin' words, and you people talk about it as if it were something like making up a new system of romanization!
> Then why not simply boil it all down to the comment field, with trigger strings for inputting the name, e-mail, sage, ID:Heaven, and fusianasan? You can get a lot more minimal with the current interface.
That's a bit too much. You want to talk about sage and fusianasan in the comment field, not trigger it with it.
I suspect you are joking here, though. Design is about what you can take away and still remain optimal conveniency/efficiency on the user part, not about taking as much away as you are technically capable of.
33 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-10-14 05:01 ID:gBva8ggI
Your browser momentarily regressed to an old bug and then got better? Who can tell?
Running in pure perl would be ideal, portability-wise, but in practice implementing a JPEG loader and saver from scratch in Perl is both a lot more work than anyone wants to do, and the result will also be too slow.
As was already stated, making a statically linked executable lets you distribute pre-compiled binaries that people can just upload along with the script.
233 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-21 22:16 ID:Heaven
>>232
Nothing! But since mode_image's footer.html includes a link to Futaba called "Futaba mode," I think mode_message should have the same.
91 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-17 13:55 ID:hjzD4Li4
Put the Entire thread link on the top of the thread, not the bottom.
306 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-24 12:15 ID:Heaven
Shift-reload already! Also, most people are familiar with "More options..." links and know when and when not to click them. I might see about styling it, though.