The Legendary Next Update (365)
111 Name: anon!21anon4H3U 2005-10-17 20:34 ID:Heaven
Thought of something else: can there be the ability to separately place a title on a board and what the head <title> element says?
Like "Music" for the header but "foolchan - music" for the title in the browser window.
300 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-23 23:06 ID:Heaven
Seconded. This'll go a long way to resolving headaches with WakabaMark and SJIS art, and there really isn't anything egregious about its current implementation into the mode_message template (nothing compared to putting it in a separate area, for example)
Going back to the CSS selector: since switching styles is not inherently supported in all browser GUIs, how about having a third party create extensions for those browsers and freeing up the real estate on the actual page? The selector to me seems out of place with the rest of the layout, simply because it's only there for the purpose of presentation, not the actual page content. How many people out there change styles from board defaults on a regular basis because of readability preferences?
229 Name: Shii the Metal Idol 2005-10-21 18:13 ID:z/kxsMjQ
0ch-PHP had this nifty feature where if it was a certain "high bandwidth" time of day, then you couldn't view the whole thread.
Hm... that is kind of useless on a worldwide forum, huh?
But there should still be an option to keep people from viewing more than 100-200 posts, as an emergency way of saving bandwidth.
143 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-19 00:56 ID:Heaven
The "Entire thread" link in the top navigation bar of the thread page is still broken.
347 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-27 16:57 ID:Heaven
Thanks. I did it the hard way and put in the proper transformations everywhere so filenames can be kept intact, though.
226 Name: &height=16)
2005-10-21 17:12 ID:Heaven
That would be a bother too.
276 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-23 17:40 ID:Heaven
>>275
Heh, I thought you had disabled it manually.
>The File field is almost never there.
Right, and when it isn't, the Formatting menu can still reside on the same line.
The error page in mode_message should more closely resemble that of 0ch (complete with "ERROR!" title).
53 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-16 01:46 ID:Heaven
>>48-50
First of all, I don't believe it would make bumps more valuable in any way. People bump threads all the time with worthless replies since most don't even know what "sage" is or means or what it is good for. They will simply continue to do this, no matter whether the sage function is changed in this way.
Even at this stage, years after its introduction to a major western userbase, people are still clueless about the main basic functions of image- and discussionboards in the Futaba/0ch style. There are some signs of improvement, but they are rare.
I doubt people would be willing or eager to learn a new, different behaviour at this point in time.
The only real change is what >>50 points out (though I want to mention that even that point is mostly misunderstood: if people want to protest against a certain thread, they should post as many sage posts as it needs to get permasaged (although it's arguably counterproductive, considering the default prune behaviour of imgboards). If threads are still bumpable and trolls find that they have been flamed with a sage, they will just bump it once more). And I don't think that's enough to justify a pretty major function change.
268 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-23 15:00 ID:Heaven
I hate that blue link next to the reply box! It looks ugly!
Also, there's no "Less options..."
Can't this be somewhere else but the post form?
349 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-27 17:20 ID:Heaven
GDLib for thumbnails: http://wakaba.c3.cx/sup/kareha.pl/1113869490/5
297 Name: Anonymous : 2005-10-23 20:52 ID:Heaven
How about appending an estimated (at the time of thread creation) time of pruning to the first post's header, if pruning-by-age is enabled?
59 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-16 21:22 ID:Heaven
I was browsing through some old threads and now they're all gone. :(
170 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-19 19:23 ID:Heaven
>There's no one English word that does the job of the pseudo-Japanese "sage".
How about "dontbump" or "nobump"? Using "down" is pretty misleading, since sage doesn't bump a thread up nor down; it just stays in its place until a thread below is bumped.
>>167 orz
In reference WAHa's post in http://wakaba.c3.cx/sup/kareha.pl/1127713568/l50
>It's been suggested to change the no-ID-on-email to no-ID-on-sage
That sounds good to me.
251 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-22 13:00 ID:Heaven
>>249
<a href> opens up the possibility of using inline links, and img tags allow bandwidth leeching from other sites (plus the fact that the image itself may be unsanitary).
330 Name: 329 : 2005-10-26 20:02 ID:Heaven (Image: 1010x554 png, 76 kb)
Oops, here's the screenshot. orz
43 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-14 16:31 ID:Heaven
PS: I always wanted to say this: The # anchors on the TiddlyWiki automatically scroll me (FF, 1.0.7) just below the actual text box of the entry. Is that a bug, a feature or... ?
144 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-19 01:11 ID:Heaven
Thanks for the links at the top. Previously, I had to search for those threads over and over again if I wanted to find them.
295 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-23 20:39 ID:Heaven
106 Name: qube3.mackey.miyazaki.miyazaki.jp 2005-10-17 15:49 ID:JzjmoL7r
test
344 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-10-27 10:34 ID:SjmelPTB
"When they shouldn't be?" They've always been bolded.
70 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-10-17 07:49 ID:Heaven
>>69
The sage seems a bit off...
245 Name: 2005-10-22 10:56 ID:Heaven
Wow, >>243 sure looks like shit in Safari. What the hell? Looks right in Firefox, though.
82 Name: Anonymous 2005-10-17 11:47 ID:Heaven
> but I don't quite see why there should be a "First 100" at the top but not at the bottom.
Probably to avoid clutter and because of the assumption that if you arrive at the bottom of a page, you can do without the "First 100" link. "First 100" seems to be a navigational aid for beginners who are new to the thread, so it makes sense to only have it at the top.