4chan brought down by Distributed Denial of Service Attack (408)

1 Name: Anonymous : 2007-10-20 14:41 ID:mDrphH4G [Del]

> 4chan is down because of DDoS attacks, stemming from a bunch of guys that are angry that moot doesn't want to move #4chan to lulznet.

-Kirtaner (of 420chan).

No real reasons to distrust this information, really. Let's hope it didn't hit 'em too hard. I must say, with the traffic that 4chan get, it must have been one fucking tidal wave of a DDOS.

159 Name: Anonymous : 2008-03-29 14:46 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>158 sage

160 Post deleted by moderator.

161 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-21 11:47 ID:Kp8sX+sA [Del]

THE SITE isn't down, all faggots are banned, DDoS WILL NEVAR KILL US
WE NEVER FORGIVE
WE NEVER FORGET

162 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-21 21:09 ID:k4lPLEkY [Del]

lol internet

163 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 00:02 ID:nlyqCJnO [Del]

naw, 7chan's up. 4 is down. not sure bout other, dont go there...

164 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 00:51 ID:dab3mP0t [Del]

i think the party van will have some work soon.....

165 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 01:51 ID:Q4zMImI5 [Del]

if 4chan goes down for good, there will just be another anyway.

166 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 02:34 ID:o9kzA3UM [Del]

last i heard it was 4nontalk doing it.

now it seems r4idchan has joined the party and is raping all chans they can think of...

nothing new from them... all the main chans are down and out and some of the lesser ones are either hiding under their alt. DNS or taking a nap

167 Post deleted by moderator.

168 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 04:34 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>166,167
Actually the guy who runs AT has been found, since he had his other personal site hosted on the same residential IP as AT. 22-year-old living in Stockholm. From Googling his name, finds out he has DDoSed other (non-*chan) sites before, so he probably had the capability to do this attack.

169 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 07:47 ID:Heaven [Del]

I just got an email from a panicking Anon who sent emails out to the top *chan administrators. Calm the fuck down, seriously. You are acting like this doesn't happen five fucking times a month.

170 Post deleted by moderator.

171 Post deleted by moderator.

172 Post deleted by moderator.

173 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 10:29 ID:t1Qyo4Oz [Del]

4chan is down again fuuuuuuuck

174 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 13:47 ID:BtH/Odz2 [Del]

>Once again a dumb group of individuals has taken it upon themselves to DDoS a bunch of imageboards into oblivion for no real reason, and once again we really find ourselves not giving a flying fuck. Youfd think people would figure it out by now, nobody really cares, nobody is going to give a rats ass about your own shitty chan site, and youfre likely going to get reamed sometime in the near future by the small collective that actually do give a shit. (http://blog.420chan.org/)

175 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 15:05 ID:WLpdBVHZ [Del]

is this the new /everything/?

176 Name: wat : 2008-07-22 15:08 ID:Heaven [Del]

Wow... do these guys really take themselves seriously? If not, then I lol'ed, but if they do it's just sad, the only people who will care that the chans are down are the people who just sit on there all day and act like idiots, that we don't want anyway. Thanks for taking out our trash for us

casual /b/tard was here
internet tough guys is a loser

177 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 15:41 ID:TtrMoIaT [Del]

>>172

i live in raleigh, just a couple of miles from morrisville. i'm gonna go egg his house, brb.

178 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 15:44 ID:BtH/Odz2 [Del]

>>177
Post pictures.

179 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 15:45 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>178
via photo hosting site of course.

180 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 16:05 ID:WLpdBVHZ [Del]

181 Post deleted by moderator.

182 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 16:11 ID:WLpdBVHZ [Del]

>>181
ur slow

183 Name: betUwishUwereAprotestFagNow : 2008-07-22 16:31 ID:IzTVfXzt [Del]

Scientology, took out 4chan. They did it to get back about their servers!

They do not forgive, they do not forget!

184 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 17:42 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>183
0/10

185 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 20:39 ID:1Vw5J1jX [Del]

Those hooligans at ebaumsworld are likely behind the recent downage of 4chan. I heard that they raided some place and claimed it was us! How dare they taint the good name of 4chan's /b/ with their dastardly acts.

186 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 22:18 ID:3OUo7+Bz [Del]

>>185
No, Just no...

187 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 22:21 ID:Heaven [Del]

What the hell is with all the blame on raidchan? We already figured out that the Swedish guy who runs AT has DDoSed sites in the past. His personal website is on the same home connection as AT, sharing the same server and IP.

188 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-22 22:24 ID:Heaven [Del]

> What the hell is with all the blame on raidchan? We already figured out that the Swedish guy who runs AT has DDoSed sites in the past. His personal website is on the same home connection as AT, sharing the same server and IP.

internationsl phone calls are too expensive for the typical /b/tard (13 years old, no job).

189 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 00:46 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>187
gb/2 raidchan

190 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 02:58 ID:k+Njfg44 [Del]

I vote we resort to end-twenty-minutes-of-The-Godfather tactics; simultaniously raiding anyone who could possibly have conspired to deprive us of precious lulz. That or, I 'unno, wait 'til 4Chan is back up. This shit happens near-constantly, it'll be over soon.

191 Name: Fucking Annoyed : 2008-07-23 05:51 ID:NDhNq6r5 [Del]

The streets will flow with the blood of those who are doing this to our beloved /b/. When we find you, YOU WILL PAY AND WE WILL HAVE OUR MUDDERFUCKING LULZ DO YOU HEAR ME TETSUO !!

192 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 06:30 ID:5mnhhFb2 [Del]

/yawn
/b/ will be full of "lol ddos" threads for a few weeks adding to the stupid now. Can't be much worse then the normal stupid though can it?

Also, cocks.

193 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 07:00 ID:SayOWrVU [Del]

>>192
So don't go to /b/ dumbass, theres only like 20 other boards on 4chan.

Anyway, this may actually last a long time, now it seems the 4chanstatus blog page is down, the last time I read it, moot said he was still fending off constand DDoS attacks.

If it comes to the worst thing possible, 4chan gets hosted somewhere else, moot still owns the domain name so it will most likely still be 4chan.org, just be directed to a different server.

That's what I see comming, or at least as a temp untill the attacks stop.

I'd also like to point out, 4chan isn't the only site. I know OverChan(2.o at least) was down for a day or two, and plenty other more populor -ch.

194 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 13:21 ID:jUkwPyHN [Del]

I miss my elitist, stuck up /mu/. ;_;

195 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 15:06 ID:1pVXvsNI [Del]

I miss my pretentious /tv/.

196 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 15:30 ID:qbkBvXJS [Del]

i miss /a/ and FUCK :

The site is still down due to an ongoing DDoS attack.

Remember kids: DDoS is cruise control for cool.

UPDATE: Well, we're still down. Unfortunately, there is very little (read: nothing) that can be done about a 3-5Gbit DDoS attack.

197 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 17:30 ID:UbLZqBPN [Del]

Motherfucking /ck/ I miss you. There is no other /ck/ that I know of :(

198 Name: Anon vi Philadelphia : 2008-07-23 17:32 ID:PahwayPj [Del]

Looks like /a/ will miss Geass Sunday if this continues.

There's no real reason to do this.... I am bored and want to surf my imageboard.

199 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 17:38 ID:mVKyz+s5 [Del]

>>187
The IRC logs are suitable proof that it's raidchan.

To everyone saying we need to raid or DDoS them back, STFU. This is not the time for stupid, script-kiddie tactics. These morons will get what's coming to them soon enough. Be patient, and stay out of the way while the big boys do their thing.

>>193

>4chan isn't the only site. I know OverChan(2.o at least) was down for a day or two, and plenty other more populor -ch.

To enumerate: 420chan is also down, and they've been attacking ED, 7chan, 12chan, and anonib with varying success, too.

200 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-07-23 17:41 ID:Heaven [Del]

> To everyone saying we need to raid or DDoS them back, STFU. This is not the time for stupid, script-kiddie tactics. These morons will get what's coming to them soon enough. Be patient, and stay out of the way while the big boys do their thing.

May I add to that that you do not post personal details about anybody here. Seriously, people, grow the fuck up.

201 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 17:47 ID:NMBqT/NA [Del]

i feel like like someone froze The Nile, lifted it out of its river bed, and plunged it into the heart of pedobear

that is how i feel right nao

fortunately i went through this many times before so i know it'll be back, that kind of softens the blow

wait, if its dos, doesnt that mean everything is ok? i would be far more worried if someone snuck a baddie onboard

202 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 18:00 ID:mVKyz+s5 [Del]

>>200
Signed. Rest assured, the people who need that kind of info have it already at this point. The rest of us are only going to cause trouble by getting involved.

203 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 18:32 ID:YsDL9LIM [Del]

i wanna /b/ack

204 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 20:04 ID:j0z3U4E2 [Del]

So this is how 4chan dies? After all those donate-or-die drives when it was in danger of running out of money, being watched by the fucking US governmet for "terrorism", and attacking Scientology, this is it? A bunch of nerdy faggots DDOS'ing 4chan is what brings it down? What the FUCK?

205 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 20:10 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>204
is this the 12th or 13th time 4chan has died? or did i miss a few times?

206 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 20:56 ID:g2xv0bK/ [Del]

Sigh, without /ck/ I'm stuck to making ice cream and cereal :|

207 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 21:05 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>205
Major (like this one) or minor (a few hours)?

I can recall around 4-5 major downs, and countless minor ones.

208 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 21:56 ID:6XuSrTRp [Del]

>>204
Um, this isn't even the first time this has happened in the past year - "brb, soup" ring a bell? 4chan has a major outage every six months or so. IIRC, this is at least the fourth major outage just since /b/day, and they were even more common in the time before that.

Calm down. Quit being so melodramatic. This too shall pass.

209 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 22:01 ID:IKoY97Kg [Del]

>>208
still annoying as hell though. I just want to go back and lurk around /k/ while i'm bored and there's nothing good on. Need to fill my time with other useless crap I guess.

210 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-23 22:45 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>207
major, and i mean since it was created.

211 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 00:01 ID:GC5+/Tsv [Del]

Anyone think that Gaia did it?

212 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 00:31 ID:6XuSrTRp [Del]

>>211
NO. LURK THE FUCK MOAR.

At least read the damned thread, FFS.

It was a bunch of bored script kiddies from raidchan trying to start a -chan war. The people who need to deal with this are doing so already. End of story.

Gaia doesn't do raids, and even if they did aren't capable of DDoS attacks. Your typical Gaia user doesn't know what a botnet is.

213 Post deleted by moderator.

214 Post deleted by moderator.

215 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 01:23 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>212
And don't forget 4nont4lk has been spamming 4chan's /b/ for a while too.

>>213,214
fuck off.

216 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 02:25 ID:vQC0tgeJ [Del]

What's most fucking annoying is the fact every single paranoid 13 year old is going to go around blaming everyone else and raiding them even when the smoking cock is already out there. Fuck, I hope /b/ dies. Sure, everyone else will feel the backlash but their Ritalin-addled "brains" will grow weary of it soon enough and gb2/gaia/myspace/etc.

217 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 03:02 ID:nFCagnod [Del]

is the ddos attack still running?

this reminds me about last year, same days (21 july - 24 july).
im still reading the IRC logs (yes im
curious, so what? >_< ) of those MOTHERF***ING BASTARDS and it looks like they're only tryin to have their 3 days of glory.
They're nothing more than bored kids, they're only pretending to be ANONSOLDIERS OF LIBERTY.
There is no real reason to DOS attack a TOTALLY FREE IMAGE BOARD, also birthplace of the most of the internet culture.
The only reason is FAGGOTRY.
And shit.
And cocks.
My engrish is crap.

218 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 03:45 ID:SSaJkvtl [Del]

218 GET!

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

219 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 04:02 ID:bWr47mcT [Del]

>>215

>And don't forget 4nont4lk has been spamming 4chan's /b/ for a while too.

Looks to me like tactics, blamegame. I guess the several attempts were probably connected: first the shitpasta using the idiots to spam the site, later spambots. They use the persistent weakness of the site, for which we anyway need a lasting solution, I would say something like a soft version of r9k for all the boards.
I for once enjoy the free time to sort my images and get some sleep in the hours normal people get it. And wow, there is outside, raining though, shit.

220 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 04:05 ID:bWr47mcT [Del]

>>219
how about an obligatory tripcode registration?

221 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 04:13 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>219,220
how about an obligatory same person?

once 4chan comes back up those who are guilty will surely face the true wrath of anon. it won't be pretty. in the past, whatever site tried to spam /b/ got shitflooded and killed. it just turned out that 4nont4lk was a bit stronger, and so survived the initial attack. but they shall fall too, eventually. anon won't miss the opportunity to once again show that trying to get attention to your site from /b/ will result in much more attention than you wanted.

222 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 04:46 ID:bWr47mcT [Del]

>>221

>how about an obligatory same person?

That's about the same, realised by tripcode, even you could see the advantage.

>once 4chan comes back up those who are guilty will surely face the true wrath of anon. it won't be pretty. in the past, whatever site tried to spam /b/ got shitflooded and killed. it just turned out that 4nont4lk was a bit stronger, and so survived the initial attack. but they shall fall too, eventually. anon won't miss the opportunity to once again show that trying to get attention to your site from /b/ will result in much more attention than you wanted.

Pure raidcancer faggotry. "Anon is legion, anon nevar forgets!" (meaning: look at me I'm pathetic with the mind of a 13 year old, Hollywood movies like Fightclub and V for Vendetta determine my worldview)
Everybody who wants a personal army can easily manipulate faggots like you: one spambot is enough.
Enjoy your aids, fail and v&.

223 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 04:57 ID:duupShYJ [Del]

/b/ suck less at becoming a tool that destroys your own site plz

224 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 06:27 ID:j0z3U4E2 [Del]

Fuck /b/, I want the rest of the site back!

225 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 08:12 ID:x57IVsR1 [Del]

Did anyone call the "MAYBE HIS HOUSE" number?

226 Name: FUCK : 2008-07-24 08:34 ID:XYaEOHSy [Del]

I, for one, will enjoy organizing raids on our attackers once 4chan is back up.

Inb4 personal army, raidcancer, etc.

I do it for the lulz

227 Name: FUCK : 2008-07-24 09:35 ID:XYaEOHSy [Del]

>>225 It's probably the FBI...

228 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 09:38 ID:aUsLjI2B [Del]

i just want the other fucking boards, i can go to other forums/chans but its different from 4chan, i dont know.........

229 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 09:48 ID:XYaEOHSy [Del]

any raidfags care to give us any inside info?

230 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 09:49 ID:DTuWqSEm [Del]

>>226
NO MORE GODDAMN RAIDS, FFS!

That's what caused this shit in the first place. People like you are why /b/ is such utter FAIL now. Raids don't deal with this kind of thing, they just lead to more raids, and the cycle never ends. I'll say it again, "LET THE BIG BOYS DEAL WITH IT." Instead of going off half-cocked, and hitting every possible perpetrator you can think of with your petty, little, half-assed raids; let the adepts, who actually know who they are after, and who know how to make it really hurt, do their thing. DDoS leads to serious RL business - it's not for kids.

tl;dl JUST FUCKING CHILL, GODDAMN IT!

231 Name: FUCK : 2008-07-24 09:50 ID:XYaEOHSy [Del]

>>230 So question... Where did you get the idea that you're more of a "big boy" than me?

232 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 10:19 ID:Cwy/Fr/G [Del]

>>231 From the fact he weighs 400+ pounds. I'd say that's a pretty good indicator, wouldn't you?

233 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 10:56 ID:MUxX2Xll [Del]

ddos'ing 4chan is like spitting into a wasps nest. yeah you get a couple of the fuckers covered in saliva, but that smug grin on your face is quickly wiped off by a cloud of angry, stinging madness. and all you can do is roll on the ground screaming in agony while they turn you into a swollen pink blob.

234 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 14:18 ID:HbLUIm/q [Del]

>>230
the internetz are turning into isreal sect with moar jews

235 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 14:38 ID:Ld3zCFfF [Del]

It wasn't YTMND, and it wasn't Ebaums. If it was YTMND, there would be a flood of YTMNDs made about it flooding their homepage. It couldn't be Ebaums because they're retarded.

236 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 15:17 ID:63shHw5k [Del]

TIDUS

237 Name: Gazing!l2U/kbqqhs : 2008-07-24 15:17 ID:fwOy0HiI [Del]

>>234
Wait, more? I thought we were already full of jews...
(<-- is jewish)

238 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 15:26 ID:U62yW9BW [Del]

>>231
I'm not. Never said I was. I said to let them do "their" work - third person, not first.

Unlike you, I've been around the "big boys" enough, and know enough about them, to know that I'm not one of them. For starters, the big boys are not posting about responding with raids, and certainly not on iichan of all places. This is beyond raids, we're talking RL shit going down at this point. I know enough to stay out of the way of that, do you?

>>235
Read the thread. It's raidchan. IRC logs don't lie. Besides which, DDoS isn't YTMND or ebaums' style any more than it's Gaia's.

239 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 16:36 ID:Heaven [Del]

> IRC logs don't lie.
<moot> i just raped a 6-year-old girl

it was in an IRC log so it must be true!

240 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 17:20 ID:x57IVsR1 [Del]

i called "viral"'s number, and he spent the night calling me back on restricted.

241 Name: QQQ 9.0 : 2008-07-24 17:34 ID:ERBdaiBz [Del]

Just did a lulzy youtube video on Biaso getting hauled off to prison.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyQQUsYAMEA

242 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 17:34 ID:wzguCa55 [Del]

Shit. Still down.

So how many days has it been?

Is 4 Chan really getting DDOS'd or is it something else?

If they are the fucker doing it must be really pissed off at 4 Chan for some reason to be able to keep this up for this long.

243 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 17:39 ID:f8ZEP5XB [Del]

I found myself getting wound up by this then it hit me. I was getting wound up by something that has no physical entity. Beyond your computer screen, 4chan has pretty much zero relevance to anything whatsoever. When you are not at your computer then 4chan ceases to exist. So why get wound up by it?

244 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 17:40 ID:wzguCa55 [Del]

Hmmm. Piratebay is down now too.

Methinks ACTA is coming...

245 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 17:50 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>238

>DDoS isn't YTMND or ebaums' style any more than it's Gaia's.

Someone missed the Internet World War of 2006, but needless to say, it wasn't them.

>>239
One of the IRC logs is over a thousand lines long. It could be fake, but I strongly doubt it.

>>242
It's been down since 2:00 AM eastern on Monday
http://status.4chan.org/

246 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 18:49 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>245
it's really not that hard to add a few lines to an existing log.

247 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 19:13 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>241

"Lulzy" means "pathetic", I take it.

248 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 20:09 ID:aUsLjI2B [Del]

fuck, it was up, but now is down again WHAT THE FUCK! I WANT /a/ BACK GODDAMNIT

249 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 20:47 ID:MNMr4tmy [Del]

>>248
It's back now.

250 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 21:09 ID:MNMr4tmy [Del]

>>245

>Someone missed the Internet World War of 2006

That was pretty lame, though: just a bunch of poorly-coordinated, weak, individual DoS attempts. No botnets = not true DDoS.

>One of the IRC logs is over a thousand lines long. It could be fake, but I strongly doubt it.

Exactly: it's too elaborate to be fake. I didn't mean to imply that lies are never told on IRC, but merely that the conversations recorded in an authentic IRC log are pretty good evidence of what transpired.

>>246

>Read the log: it's not a matter of "a few lines."

251 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-24 22:58 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>250
this log?

i could easily make up something like that in about 2 hours.
just look at how many of those lines are the same thing repeated over and over again. and how many of them are just random people asking if raidchan is responsible for the ddos and being ignored. there's very little actual content.

252 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 00:55 ID:Nmra1kpZ [Del]

>>251
The problem is that made-up (or even embellished) logs always come out looking composed. This one has details people trying to fake it always forget. It doesn't look composed.

253 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 01:51 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>252
never say always.
i'm not saying this one is fake, i'm just saying that things like this are easy to fake, so an IRC log is not really any kind of reliable evidence at all.

254 Name: anonymous : 2008-07-25 01:57 ID:k0DxahIp [Del]

I want /a/ back!

it's almost geass sunday :(

255 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 02:16 ID:ZR7n7dIl [Del]

>>253
I don't entirely disagree, except for the "easy" part. They're easy enough to fake, but not easy to fake well. That means that they usually are reasonably reliable evidence.

I might add, that, in this case, the skiddie from raidchan that was at the center of the thing (pacifico) has acknowledged (on youtube) the authenticity of the log at this point, though he persists in disputing his or raidchan's role in the attack (he claims, among other things, that their attack lasted for only ten minutes, that it didn't involve a botnet, and that they don't have capability for the 3-5Gb attack moot referred to).

>>254
It was back for quite a bit earlier, but now it's down again.

256 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 03:25 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>255,252
I've been ruminating over the logs a bit, and they certainly do look authentic on the first glance, but there's still something about them that's unsettling, particularly the timestamps.

pacifico is a teenager, and as most teenagers are, loves attention. While it's disputable whether he played a central role in the attack, he certainly wanted to be. Maybe he did launch some minor attacks, but I also doubt he has that big of a botnet -- raidchan as their name implies has attempted DDoSes on other sites in the past, but they've never managed much bandwidth.

257 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 03:34 ID:IAcTjF2L [Del]

poor 4 chan. Dam DDoS according to moots blog

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

"The site is still down due to an ongoing DDoS attack.

Remember kids: DDoS is cruise control for cool.

UPDATE: Well, we're still down. Unfortunately, there is very little (read: nothing) that can be done about a 3-5Gbit DDoS attack."

by moot @ 12:32 AM

258 Name: Anonymous : 2008-07-25 03:42 ID:Heaven [Del]

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: