Xee (1000)

1 Name: Mr VacBob!JqK7T7zan. 2005-07-26 13:25 ID:+Fwu3KWy [Del]

I'm using this now, but I'd like it better if it had these features:

  • some way to open a folder from the command line ("open -a Xee ." doesn't work).
  • some way to advance to the next image one-handed on a laptop keyboard, possibly with , and . (obvious joke goes here).

767 Name: Horoskop : 2007-12-09 13:30 ID:3ptgfmIO [Del]

I have the same problem! Thanks for the lot of Replays and Helps ;)

768 Name: Naouel : 2007-12-10 14:07 ID:dJAa10ne [Del]

Hello Xee users,

Here is a version with fixed fullscreen for MacOS 10.5

Just go there http://aorlinsk2.free.fr/xee/

769 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2007-12-11 03:26 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>768

Is that using samiamwork's fix, or your own?

770 Name: Naouel : 2007-12-11 05:12 ID:noe9+4zi [Del]

this is my own fix. I didn't know that another fix was made.

771 Name: George : 2007-12-11 05:23 ID:F/e/6s0R [Del]

Thanks Naouel - it works a treat for. Hope your fix finds its way into the release soon.

772 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2007-12-11 07:13 ID:6THb/Qdo [Del]

>>770

Do you have a diff for it?

773 Name: Naouel : 2007-12-11 12:59 ID:dJAa10ne [Del]

774 Name: VaNyA : 2007-12-11 15:23 ID:D6c4RSvf [Del]

Thanks Naouel!

There still are some problems with this fix. If you don't go full screen Xee works as usual. Once in fullscreen, sometimes a picture won't show (or will show half-loaded); if you exit fullscreen the problem persists. If you launch Xee with the picture that didn't show before and go fullscreen, then this one will be displayed but some other won't.
This happens with folders where some pictures have been saved by Photoshop or some other app (screenshots as well). Folders with only straight out of the camera or downloaded from the web pictures seem to be working perfectly.

775 Name: Kevin : 2007-12-14 18:12 ID:kn8N1vA0 (Image: 1440x900 png, 1538 kb) [Del]

src/1197684737833.png: 1440x900, 1538 kb

Hey, I love Xee, but on Leopard I've noticed a pretty serious color discrepancy between Xee and other OS X image viewers (like Quick Look and Preview).

The colors in Xee seem a lot more washed out. Is this a known bug? I'm using 10.5.1 on a 15" SR MBP.

776 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2007-12-14 20:13 ID:Heaven [Del]

Yes.

777 Name: Kevin : 2007-12-15 19:50 ID:kn8N1vA0 [Del]

Okay, I just wanted to let you know. Did this exist in Tiger? I've been on Leopard since the end of October and I can't remember.

778 Name: Kevin : 2007-12-15 19:50 ID:kn8N1vA0 [Del]

Okay, I just wanted to let you know. Did this exist in Tiger? I've been on Leopard since the end of October and I can't remember.

779 Name: Miell : 2007-12-24 15:09 ID:FrzXJW4h [Del]

Issue with a lot of files in a folder.

Folks, I tried using Xee 2.0 (on Leopard) to manage a folder that had about 1,500 images. As soon as I started Xee, it would crawl to a stop and the CPU would spike to 100% and stay at that level for few minutes. When I would delete/move files, same thing would happen... it would beachball and CPU would hit 100%.

Anyone know what's causing that?

780 Name: Hayden : 2007-12-25 08:43 ID:gr2ji/cV [Del]

I'm using Xee 2.0 and I'm shooting with a Canon 30D in Raw. Xee is really nice, but it seems to render RAW files not great. I shoot on a setting that lets me save to both RAW and JPG and the jpg files look a lot nicer (which I expected), but what is confusing to me is that Preview renders the RAW files and they look nicer than the way Xee does it. I've tried everything to make Xee render the files "correctly".

Okay, that's not a huge deal. Who knows, maybe Xee is showing the RAW files correctly. However, when I edit RAW files using Lightroom and save those files into JPGs, Xee renders THE JPG files differently than Preview. The image that I see as the final print in Lightroom, that's what Preview shows. But then I throw the same image to Xee, and Xee renders it with a lot of macroblocking, etc. It's really weird.

Anyone have any idea what's going on here?

781 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2007-12-27 17:15 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>779

Known bug, fixed in development version.

>>780

Lack of colour management. Will be fixed sooner or later.

782 Name: Pierre : 2007-12-29 08:07 ID:50LABsr2 [Del]

Hi guys !
I used Xee for quite some time and it's great.
Open my Nikon RAW files without trouble.
Recently I bought a Canon G9.
Xee keep telling me it could'nt display file ???
Yes, Canon CR2 raw image is selected in the formats list.

Any tips ???
Thank's

783 Name: Pierre : 2007-12-29 08:07 ID:50LABsr2 [Del]

Hi guys !
I used Xee for quite some time and it's great.
Open my Nikon RAW files without trouble.
Recently I bought a Canon G9.
Xee keep telling me it could'nt display file ???
Yes, Canon CR2 raw image is selected in the formats list.

Any tips ???
Thank's

784 Name: Pierre : 2007-12-29 08:07 ID:50LABsr2 [Del]

Hi guys !
I used Xee for quite some time and it's great.
Open my Nikon RAW files without trouble.
Recently I bought a Canon G9.
Xee keep telling me it could'nt display file ???
Yes, Canon CR2 raw image is selected in the formats list.

Any tips ???
Thank's

785 Name: Albright!LC/IWhc3yc : 2007-12-29 13:33 ID:TaFfMMrj [Del]

Eighteen months ago, someone said…

> I would like to request an Open Recent menu item.

I sometimes miss this feature as well. Please get it working if you can!

Also, Xee's version info does not show up when you do a Get Info on it in the Finder.

Now that I've whined, here's some praise. I know it's been around for a while, but I just gotta say that I really like the feature that displays images in the same order they're sorted as in the Finder. That's so incredibly handy. Being able to rotate images and save them losslessly is great too.

786 Name: raimue : 2007-12-30 06:00 ID:cXim3igp [Del]

I tried to build it myself, but ran into this error:

/Developer/usr/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: can't locate framework for: -framework XADMaster

Where can I get this framework?

787 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2007-12-31 05:25 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>786

The Unarchiver.

788 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-31 19:35 ID:VIBNtOmc [Del]

fullscreen is not working, i get white blank screen insted on leopard

789 Name: Kisaragi : 2007-12-31 23:16 ID:Xq7HL/xf [Del]

Same problem as above, blank white screen in fullscreen mode in Leopard.

790 Name: chaloots : 2008-01-01 05:54 ID:ZJh+Y6n/ [Del]

I just installed the universal binary version of Xee. Gotta tell ya, because of what I perceived to be a loooong time to load I was quite apprehensive opening it. The newer version is much quicker. Thanks.

As a recent refugee from another OS, it (Xee) reminds me of one of my favorite apps, Irfanview. Great work!

One teeny gripe though: might it be possible to add a "check for update" option in one of the file menu choices? Not that it matters now, as I'd gone to the website and discovered a newer version anyway, but a thought nonetheless...

791 Name: freediverx : 2008-01-01 14:17 ID:tmmLrfvd [Del]

Any timeframe for the full screen view fix?

792 Post deleted by user.

793 Name: Bill : 2008-01-02 16:58 ID:7HbjlmKf [Del]

Xee is a very fast viewer, but is there a way to rate photos?

What is "destination 1, 2, 3..."?

Thanks, Bill

794 Post deleted by user.

795 Post deleted by user.

796 Name: Tim : 2008-01-12 17:23 ID:HND255nB [Del]

Are you planning to localize it into new languages?

If so, I can help.

797 Name: Lars G. : 2008-01-12 18:52 ID:dx6qhPp7 [Del]

Amazing piece of software; fast, pretty images, no hassle - Thanks (o:

798 Name: Mick F : 2008-01-13 16:24 ID:XmIzT5ck [Del]

Great App,

Is there a way for dual image mode, so the left pane is one image and the right another.

I was after this feature for reading CBR/Z as the 'book' interface is a more natural read.

Cheers
Mick

799 Name: dds : 2008-01-16 18:49 ID:QB16o/0u [Del]

I've been using xee for quite a while now and really love it. However, I just got a Nikon D300, but Xee won't open the RAW (.NEF) files produced. Is an update in the works to fix this -- or have I done something to have caused the problem?

dds

800 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-01-17 13:28 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>799

Xee just uses the built-in OS X loading for RAW formats. If your version of OS X supports the files, Xee should support them. If it doesn't, that's a bug.

801 Name: zX : 2008-01-18 08:38 ID:aKfCSdnJ [Del]

hey!!!
any chances tor fullscreen mode in Leopard.
everyon's beggin YOU
Xee is the best and we cant use it!!!
PLEASE

802 Name: zX : 2008-01-18 08:39 ID:aKfCSdnJ [Del]

hey!!!
any chances tor fullscreen mode in Leopard.
everyon's beggin YOU
Xee is the best and we cant use it!!!
PLEASE

803 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-23 08:35 ID:VxzWISvD [Del]

Hello Xee users,

Here is a version with fixed fullscreen for MacOS 10.5

Just go there http://aorlinsk2.free.fr/xee/

804 Name: zX : 2008-01-26 15:50 ID:qbQOKZuB [Del]

Finally! thanx a lot!

805 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-26 18:43 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>803

Patches! Patches!

806 Name: Toxi : 2008-01-27 22:02 ID:yILwxWQm [Del]

Big THX to 803! :) It works now (Fullscreen) on my new iMac MacOS 10.5.1 without Problems.

807 Name: Tom : 2008-01-30 11:36 ID:g50Z/RRR [Del]

803: Thanks for the Leopard fullscreen fix

808 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-11 15:42 ID:BcTCx8CP [Del]

All right, finally 10.5.2 is out, and Apple did fix the NSOpenGLView bug!

So to anyone who's had problems with full screen not working: Update to 10.5.2, and it's fixed!

809 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-11 23:34 ID:Heaven [Del]

Apple actually fixed a bug instead of making developers use a workaround?

Amazing.

810 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-12 02:36 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>809
They tend to do that now and then. You might be thinking of the other company.

811 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-13 14:34 ID:Heaven [Del]

812 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-13 14:45 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>811
Sucks. I put in a bug report for Safari and it was fixed in the next version.

813 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-13 16:57 ID:Heaven [Del]

To be fair, they did pay enough attention to close one of my reports as a duplicate, though!

The report about this bug is still listed as "open", though.

814 Name: Adobe : 2008-02-15 08:14 ID:aZnFDw3N [Del]

Hi there.
when we will see any update for Xee? have some problems with leopard for example we i go for look the images in full screen.

Thanks

815 Name: Adobe : 2008-02-15 08:14 ID:aZnFDw3N [Del]

Hi there.
when we will see any update for Xee? have some problems with leopard for example we i go for look the images in full screen.

Thanks

816 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-15 11:03 ID:Heaven [Del]

817 Name: Kevin : 2008-02-17 18:23 ID:kn8N1vA0 [Del]

Will there be an update to address the color issue? I love the features of Xee, but the colors in Preview are so much better.

818 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-18 04:26 ID:Heaven [Del]

Probably, but don't hold your breath. It's not an easy thing to get right, and I don't have much time at the moment.

819 Name: M : 2008-02-20 14:26 ID:gdZZALbP [Del]

>>739
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem: I rotate my picture and then press Cmd+S or if I go to File -> Save Losslessly then I get an error message: Image saving failed Couldn't save image.

any ideas?

820 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-21 04:50 ID:6THb/Qdo [Del]

>>819

Are the file permissions set so that you are allowed to overwrite that file?

821 Name: Anonymous : 2008-02-21 07:53 ID:gdZZALbP [Del]

>>820
I think so. That are just normal photos from my mobile.
And the funny thing is now:

  • I rotate the picture
  • I press Cmd+S or File -> Save Losslessly
  • I get the error message
  • If I click on left or right to view the next pictures and then come back to the "rotated" picture, it is shown as it was before - not rotated.
  • BUT: if I close the application and reopen it (or open this file with another programm) everything is fine. The picture is rotated!

I'm just wondering now, why I get this error message and why it only get in effect, if I restart the program...

822 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-21 15:37 ID:6THb/Qdo [Del]

>>821

Are the files on a local drive, or on some networked drive?

823 Name: M : 2008-02-21 16:46 ID:gdZZALbP [Del]

on a local drive

824 Name: M : 2008-02-21 16:46 ID:gdZZALbP [Del]

on a local drive

825 Name: X : 2008-02-24 16:48 ID:4UzJ/NIa [Del]

Hi, I was wondering if there was any way to have the sort order be "Date Created" instead of "Date Modified". Or else use the photo date from the EXIF data.

I made the mistake of using Canon's photo browsing utility, which for some reason changed all of the date modified dates to today. That means that Xee (which I really like) is no longer useful for browsing through by date.

Thanks in advance.

826 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-02-27 10:55 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>825

EXIF date sorting would actually be really nice to have, but it would also be hard to implement fast enough. But I might look into it.

827 Name: Anonymous : 2008-03-09 13:15 ID:j3o20fVZ [Del]

The ability to unlock password-protected RAR files is a critically need feature! I look forward to seeing it added. Thanks for your work on this!

828 Name: Raymond : 2008-03-11 17:33 ID:aFo+cbRA [Del]

Xee is a great image browsing software, thanks a lot.
But if the setting could be save will be much better.
Such as the size of the window could be memorized when reopen the software, the zoom ratio could be save when reopen.

829 Name: Edwin : 2008-03-21 02:15 ID:nm38BYj+ [Del]

Great program bit I miss the autosave after a rotate. Is it possible that you make this a preference (autosave on/off after rotating) ?

830 Name: Poo : 2008-03-22 16:47 ID:8/hEivgM [Del]

I used to use ACDSee to browse and view images on my PC. I've missed having something that feels like that application on my mac. Until now that is. Xee works for me just like the way I used to use ACDSee. Thank you very much for this app.

831 Name: Jan : 2008-03-23 15:06 ID:CGVrqv/8 [Del]

Hi, plus one for the auto-save option. I would love this feature, too!
best
Jan

832 Name: Esben : 2008-03-29 03:33 ID:ivtz2hcE [Del]

Fantastic! I had about 400 photos taken with two different cameras that I had to split up into two folders: one for each camera. Oh no, this is going to take a lot of time identifying which photo have been taken with which camera and then copying it into the right folder... but then Xee appeared! Using its Copy function and its Image Info function this took me about ten minutes! Thank you for a great app.

833 Post deleted by moderator.

834 Post deleted by moderator.

835 Post deleted by moderator.

836 Name: Anonymous : 2008-04-28 07:53 ID:1QMDIsc+ [Del]

Xee is awesome.
I've been using a mix of some homemade python scripts
and xee copy/move functionality to sort my photo library
w/o the slowdown of iphoto. However, I noticed if
I try to browse a directory full of symlinked images,
xee follows the links and ends up browsing the directory
the actual files exist in. Is there a way to keep xee
from following the links or do I need to roll my
own version to disable this feature?

thanks again for the incredibly fast app.

837 Post deleted by user.

838 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-04-28 17:58 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>836

Hmm, I guess that should be fixed. File a bug on the bug tracker.

839 Name: Anonymous : 2008-05-02 22:57 ID:WvpFsU6B [Del]

A possible feature would be to have xee handle finder's thumbnail request for archives (producing a thumbnail for the archive). Great piece of software, btw.

840 Name: fidel : 2008-05-09 12:45 ID:dALlaDPz [Del]

hi,

seems like Xee 2.0 is not able to handle Canons raw format completly.

If i use Canon Raw (.cr2) on a EOS 40D Xee is able to handle the images.
If i switch on the EOS to Canon's S-raw (.cr2) Xee is not able to handle the files.

a) Is that a known issue ?
b) If you are interested i can offer some example files. Just tell me what you need to know in detail.

Best regards and thanks for that great viewer

841 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-05-10 11:06 ID:BcTCx8CP [Del]

>>840

Xee does raw loading through the OS X built-in functions. If you find a file that does open in Preview but not in Xee, then send me an example. If it opens in neither, that's expected behaviour.

842 Name: nico : 2008-05-16 11:49 ID:YxDRJc78 [Del]

This doesn't seem to be an issue with other folks who use Xee, but i would really like to see an image re-sizing feature in Xee (to shrink down large images from their originals--say make a 3000x2000 pixel image 300x200 pixels, for web use.)

does xee already do this? am i missing a feature? or is this not a needed feature for most folks?

it seems very useful to me, for re-sizing of images for web. if i travel without a computer and use someone else's mac, i often need to resize photos for web use, but if the computer i'm using doesn't have photoshop, i'm outta luck for freeware programs that do image resizing.

843 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-05-16 13:47 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>842

Well, on the one hand, it's a bit outside the scope of an image viewer to do image editing tasks. On the other hand, firing up Photoshop is a royal pain. So I might add it sooner or later.

844 Name: Anonymous : 2008-05-19 19:43 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>843
Ever try Seashore?

845 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-05-20 10:16 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>844

I think I tried it once, and concluded like all other similar apps, it is far too much of a toy to ever be of any practical use to me, and keeping it around just to resize images doesn't really win me much over just using Photoshop.

846 Name: Anonymous : 2008-05-20 11:35 ID:Heaven [Del]

I use it to do all the stupid little things that it's just too annoying to load Photoshop for, like quick crop, resize, change format, draw a box, etc. stuff. More often than not I have no use for 99.9% of Photoshop's features and something a bit more lobotomized is quite handy to have around, especially since it loads nearly instantly. That said I grew up doing pixel-editing with MS Paint...

847 Post deleted by user.

848 Post deleted by user.

849 Post deleted by user.

850 Name: prometh : 2008-05-22 07:57 ID:CYj0cbXt [Del]

FEATURE REQUEST:

First off, Xee is an awesome product and I think it's absolutely great! However, like everyone, we have our own tastes, and here are 3 requests I have with stars (asterisks) representing my feeling of importance for each.

***** If you press either the next or previous image buttons, the mouse cursor should move to the new button screen position when Xee's window resizes to the image dimensions. Having to move my mouse every time gets annoying, and I like viewing images at their actual size.

**** When opening the first image (that opens the Xee window), it'd be nice if Xee didn't show up with a black background before the image becomes visible. It just looks sloppy.

** An icon pack that more resembles Preview would be cool, to keep in with the Apple feel. I have manually copied in Preview icons, but if such were already done, that'd be better.

851 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-05-22 18:14 ID:Heaven [Del]

> If you press either the next or previous image buttons, the mouse cursor should move to the new button screen position when Xee's window resizes to the image dimensions. Having to move my mouse every time gets annoying, and I like viewing images at their actual size.

Moving the mouse pointer is a big no-no in GUI design. I will not do that. With the default settings, the window should not resize when using the toolbar buttons, unless you explicitly changed that in the settings.

> When opening the first image (that opens the Xee window), it'd be nice if Xee didn't show up with a black background before the image becomes visible. It just looks sloppy.

Progressive loading of the image is a feature, not a bug.

> An icon pack that more resembles Preview would be cool, to keep in with the Apple feel. I have manually copied in Preview icons, but if such were already done, that'd be better.

If you can provide some icons that are colour-coded, badged, and distinguishable down to 16 pixel size, I'll put it up.

852 Name: Anonymous : 2008-05-23 00:57 ID:Heaven [Del]

> When opening the first image (that opens the Xee window), it'd be nice if Xee didn't show up with a black background before the image becomes visible. It just looks sloppy.

When I open huge files I appreciate how it communicates that the app isn't stalled. Do you want to be left 20 seconds without any sort of feedback?

853 Name: Anonymous : 2008-05-30 14:36 ID:lWxNf7bl [Del]

>>663-666

I don't want to install The Unarchiver, and I don't want anything associated with those files.

854 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-06-01 05:19 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>853

RCDefaultApp can set associations to a dummy app if you absolutely want. That's the only way to stop OS X automatically associating files with apps that can open them.

855 Name: Richard Yapeter : 2008-06-05 21:33 ID:4eZn1Dq4 [Del]

I'm replying about Canon RAW formats (also for other brand camera RAW)

Canon latest camera 40D and 450D raw are saved with .cr2 however it's different compression make them unreadable until update.

Since Xee depending on OSX Raw support. You can download the "Digital Camera RAW Support update" from apple website.

So RAW problem is not there because of Xee but because camera developer keep making new format and using same extention

856 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-06-06 03:40 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>855

Actually, the format is probably the same, but the problem is that there are differences between the sensors in the different cameras that use the same format, and this data about the sensors is not stored in the file, so the loading program has to be updated for each new camera.

It's not exactly a good design.

857 Name: GlassONionZ : 2008-06-10 18:44 ID:AUsYJ8k/ [Del]

Gracias! Thanks for this great piece of software.

Is it possible to implement in Xee a Lanzcos or a Bicubic interpolation for zooming small images? When Xee3? Thanks again.

858 Name: ConfusedUser : 2008-06-16 18:15 ID:dXfPjx8U [Del]

Why is it when I rotate a jpeg image from my camera and save losslessly that the resulting file is smaller than the original?

859 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-06-17 04:39 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>858

How much smaller? The embedded thumbnail is re-generated from scratch, so if the camera makes a very high-quality thumbnail, that could be it.

860 Post deleted by user.

861 Post deleted by user.

862 Name: ConfusedUser : 2008-06-17 06:41 ID:dXfPjx8U [Del]

>>859

Before IMG_0398.JPG 1.1 MB (1,126,799)
After IMG_0398.JPG 1.1 MB (1,126,435)

Before IMG_0399.JPG 1.2 MB (1,263,499)
After IMG_0399.JPG 1.2 MB (1,263,422)

The camera is a Canon Powershot A510 3.2 Megapixels.

863 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-06-17 13:41 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>862

Yeah, a difference that small would just be because of the new thumbnail.

864 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2008-06-17 13:42 ID:Heaven [Del]

(Also, I haven't looked into the details, but the Huffman compression step of the JPEG may turn out slightly different after you rotate the image, so that would also affect the file size slightly.)

865 Name: ConfusedUser : 2008-06-17 15:45 ID:dXfPjx8U [Del]

>>864

I guess I was just assuming the term "lossless" meant "lossless" obviously it doesn't mean absolutely "lossless". Thanks.

866 Name: Anonymous : 2008-06-18 01:31 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>865
what do you think "lossless" means if not "not losing any information"?
the thumbnail shouldn't contain any information not in the actual image.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.