Japanese PHOTO boards (44)

1 Name: lily queen!D8r4gJTFUk 2005-01-03 18:45 ID:Heaven [Del]

Japanese photo image boards, anyone?

2 Name: Anonymous 2005-01-03 20:14 ID:Heaven [Del]

http://www.pandora.nu/naoking/ is a good place to start

3 Name: lily queen!D8r4gJTFUk 2005-01-04 16:28 ID:Heaven [Del]

Thanks--I'm finding good stuff there already.

4 Name: Anonymous 2005-03-17 12:41 ID:Heaven [Del]

5 Name: Anonymous 2005-03-22 08:57 ID:Heaven [Del]

6 Name: Anonymous 2005-09-19 23:15 ID:Heaven [Del]

Pandora.nu rejects you if you have the wrong I. P. Address range. Try this website.

7 Name: Anonymous 2005-09-28 23:55 ID:V5QMST85 [Del]

>>6
Uh ... which website?

8 Name: Anonymous 2005-09-29 01:55 ID:ZyKX9xxm [Del]

>>7
hint: the "Link" field is sometimes used for links. Click on "Anonymous" in >>6

9 Name: ghostboy 2005-10-27 13:22 ID:xgSZhrDt [Del]

searching on http://www.1chan.net/overchan/
i have found

http://kkake.org/s/ (with Hot Japanese girls, clothed and unclothed)

10 Post deleted by moderator.

11 Post deleted by moderator.

12 Post deleted by moderator.

13 Name: LOVE : 2005-12-12 08:10 ID:ZzsdxKiN [Del]

japanese image bord.
http://aiaiaiaiaika.h.fc2.com/

14 Name: lily queen!D8r4gJTFUk : 2006-01-11 22:54 ID:1SCAbgzy [Del]

>>13
Hey, they link to us! (to iichan.net , that is)

15 Name: LOVE : 2006-02-27 13:58 ID:ZzsdxKiN [Del]

16 Name: Anonymous : 2006-02-28 09:19 ID:Heaven [Del]

Isn't this spam?

17 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2006-02-28 09:24 ID:Heaven [Del]

I dunno, as >>14 says, they do link to iichan and stuff. Borderline enough that I'll let it pass.

18 Post deleted by moderator.

19 Post deleted by moderator.

20 Post deleted by moderator.

21 Post deleted by moderator.

22 Post deleted by moderator.

23 Post deleted by moderator.

24 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-09 09:16 ID:Heaven [Del]

Spam attracts more spam!

25 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2006-03-09 10:27 ID:Heaven [Del]

This is getting a bit annoying. Should I turn on captchas? I do have some other ideas for getting less spam, but they generally rely on people running browsers with Javascript on (because spammers don't), and such...

26 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-09 13:34 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>25
This board is getting so little traffic from real users, I don't think captchas turned on would inflict any real damage on the situation as it is.

27 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-09 16:05 ID:Heaven [Del]

How about a onetime captcha? Just have a page with a captcha and if you pass it sets a cookie that you are human. I know the spammers could just set the cookie but they likely aren't paying attention at all and are just mass spamming. A captcha with every post wouldn't be that horrible though.. as no one posts a lot.

28 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2006-03-09 16:24 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>27

Well, it's a workable idea, but it doesn't solve the main problem, which is: what about people without cookies or javascript or with text browsers?

29 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-10 09:43 ID:quW3FWoS [Del]

>without cookies or javascript

you could make it work without javascript... just about every browser supports cookies, and many allow users to enable cookies only for certain sites...

>text browsers

http://wakaba.c3.cx/soc/kareha.pl/1122273773/48-49,53,56

30 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-10 20:55 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>29 you realize that whole discussion is wrong, right?

31 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-10 23:13 ID:Heaven [Del]

Skip the captcha for useragents for lynx/links2/screenreaders? Follows the same pattern that the spammers aren't going to notice because they don't care. I don't think the spam is that big of an issue though but maybe I'm just used to ignoring it. How about you can only age a topic if you have passed the captcha? They mostly seem to spam long dead threads that no one cares about anyways.

32 Post deleted by moderator.

33 Post deleted by moderator.

34 Name: Anonymous : 2006-03-28 16:56 ID:ECSjgIws [Del]

set the alt of the captcha to a clue as to what it is
mine was 'exchame". you could set alt to say something like:
"ame" last "ex" first "hc" backwards and in the middle

35 Name: rotter!BlvLLaHZjQ : 2006-03-29 11:37 ID:Dr1c7b3J [Del]

We actually implemented a sort of a poor man's Turing test on a website that allowed anonymous submissions. Not unlike an imageboard's reply function in fact.

It goes like this: In addition to the name/link/content fields in the form, you stick a text field in there with the label "leave this field empty". If the field is not left empty, silently discard the posted data. Since spambots tend to fill every field in with spammy garbage with little discrimination, they would fall for the test. No Javascript and no captcha involved, compatible with blind people.

There's quite a few variations and improvements upon this theme that you can come up with too.

36 Post deleted by moderator.

37 Post deleted by moderator.

38 Name: Anonymous : 2006-04-27 01:14 ID:tgOSatmp [Del]

>>29
At the risk of replying to a dead topic, I'd like to mention that there is a such thing a server-side cookies, or text files that are automatically deleted after a period of time. I think VBScript is usually used for this, but with a bit of work, could probably be adapted to any language.

39 Name: Anonymous : 2006-05-16 08:18 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>38 YOU HAVE OPENED MY EYES to a whole new world!
Oh my god! VBScript! and Cookies! and automatic deletion!! adaptability to different languages. Hmm, maybe I should try to set cookies with javascript....may sound strange but I think it can be done.

40 Post deleted by moderator.

41 Post deleted by moderator.

42 Post deleted by moderator.

43 Post deleted by moderator.

44 Post deleted by moderator.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: