I don't see any inconsistencies in >>341 except for the rounded corners.
>Most admins probably don't get point of the secret string anyway, and asking them to put in several is just too annoying. In retrospect, I'd like to add a second layer of hashing to these, but that'd mean breaking secure trips AGAIN.
You could take the route that MrVB (I think?) did and generate the strings on first run? openssl, /dev/random, perl's random as last resort. In almost every case you are going to get a better random string than most people will supply, and if they want to change it they can. Or only have them generated if they are not supplied.
Honestly, when people care so much about anonymity they can put up with the changes required to ensure it.
GDLib for thumbnails: http://wakaba.c3.cx/sup/kareha.pl/1113869490/5
> statically linked executable
I have to disagree with this. It should run in perl too.
>Let people figure out things themselves, if they are so keen on changing their keywords.
If you really want to use your own custom trigger strings, you can easily search kareha.pl for instances where "sage" and "fusianasan" are used in that context and either replace them with those custom strings or append them as secondary strings. It's not something that warrants additional config.pl parameters.
I think it'd be a better idea to have some kind of load-balancing/distributed server cluster approach, like what dmpk2k was working on for Wakaba.
This my just be me, but I'd like a link to the entire thread in karaha at the top of threads.
I'm not sure I want to make a ban system. I'd rather just make it easy to interface with a simple banning script that does whatever's needed for the server it's running on.
>>294 Hey I like the new formatting bit. Should it collapse back down if you click away or if you click the "More options..." bit again, like the text box?
Just a thought. This setup is easier and more obvious than using the link field, with "AA" or "Wakabamark". BTW, I just realized that was a pun. Boo! Hiss! Not punny! :)
>> More information on the all threads page, date of the last post? file size?
Well, I had already proposed the filesize indicator in >>208, but optimally I would actually prefer that subback resemble the one in 0ch (ie, same as the main page thread list, but without CSS).
And single-post links don't include the thread's first post anyway, so there's no need for >>n. Quoting an entire post is not wise either.
>Isn't this essentially the same as saying "Please don't talk so much?"
In a sense, yes. Just like the postcount limit could be interpreted as "Please don't talk so long".
>what
main page -- 161 Name:◆WAHa.06x36:2005/10/21(Fri) 14:44 ID:Heaven
subpage -- 4 :◆WAHa.06x36:2005/10/21 14:44 ID:Heaven
Question: does Kareha have a 1001th post message like "Name: 1001:Over 1000 Thread" for when a thread exceeds its postcount limit?
>>170
But my good man, sage means down.
> Also, how is Kahera unrivaled when there are still large sites that are not running it? Shiichan is still on world4ch, Thorn on parts of wakachan for example.
These are temporary problems because the webmasters of both sites are too stubborn to upgrade.
This is the obligatory encoding test ... in <code>
㋋㏡
ゔ〲〰 ゔ〲〲〰〰 ゔ〲〰 ゔ〲〰 ゔ〲〰ゔ 〲〰ゔ 〲〰ゔ〲〲〰ゔゔ
〳〵ヷヷヷヷ〰〰〰〳〵ヷヷヷヷ〰〰〰〳〵ヷヷヷヷ〰〰〰
(♛ฺД)(*゜∀゜)~♡ℳฺℴฺℯฺ❤ℒฺℴฺνℯฺ..._〆(゜▽゜*)㌰㌰ ㍉㍍㌧㌔㌶㍊㌣㌦
㌀㌁㌂㌃㌄㌅㌆㌇㌈㌉㌊㌋㌌☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ ☠ฺ
☼♭♬♫♨♩♧♦♥♤♣♢♠♡♐ฺ♑ฺ♒ฺ♓ฺ ♔ฺ♕ฺ ♖ฺ ♗ฺ♘ฺ♙ฺ♚ฺ♛ฺ♜ฺ♝(・∀・)/ヾ~~╋┓!㋦㋸㋭°
|壁|」゜ρ゜)」 ノ ヽ``~ 力㋦㋸㋭°
/ ⌒ヽ
/ ´_ゝ`) I am sorry、 the β α κ α kopipe couldn't be carried out・・・
| /
| /| |
// | |
U .U How about a function to replace an inappropriate image with a standard image? (aka HelloKitty.gif)
>>157
So the functions need to be hardcoded to a post element one way or another? If I wanted to, let's say, create a template for gazo-box or Shiichan (both use checkboxes for sage), I'd need to slightly modify kareha.pl to check that new checkbox input instead of the Link string input?
An interesting limitation. Thanks for explaining.
About permasaging/deleting after a certain thread filesize is reached: would this be the same as a limit on the total number of characters in a thread? Or would we also include WakabaMark formatting, hyperlinks (including navigation), name/date/title headers, reply boxes, and non-Unicode characters in the formula?
>>158
Chances are that most if not all major/fundamental changes made to Kareha's core scripts will clash with the philosophy of most people here (including WAHa), and they won't care for them anyway. There really aren't all that many big-bang end-user features left to be implemented in Kareha before it loses its minimalist charm.
P.S. Reminder for >>85
>>313 Like lots of people use them anyway </sarcasm>. Yes, security is a good idea. What are the holes, anyway?
> (albeit edge cases)
Which is the crux of the matter - it mostly doesn't matter to the vast majority of users.
> You still end up with no way to link the fusianasan post with the name/trip one without IDs enabled (unless the ID method is known and no secret data is used).
You can use fusianasan with a tripcode, at least on Kareha. I suspect you can on 0ch too, but I haven't checked.
> It's not worth comparing until it doesn't break regularly.
The only problem with it is that it doesn't do paranoid file writes. The fact that the entire server occasionally breaks isn't related to how broken the script itself is.
> Is it intentional that thread links without a trailing slash
Uh, I was wondering the same thing. I'm not sure. I guess I should fix that.
Hmmm, I just noticed you still allow <a> tags, which would let posters use inline links. Are you gonna keep that?
How come this is now the by far biggest thread on this board?
Maybe it's because I'm posting useless replies like this one!
This my just be me, but I'd like a link to the entire thread in karaha at the top of threads.
Wakaba:
I've also had an idea swimming around: an option to only count actual thread bumps in MAX_RES (not "sage" posts). I think it would lead to making each bump more valuable so that people don't do so wastefully and unnecessarily.
>>137
I also noticed that you removed the CSS selector in individual thread views. Personally, it seems both the Admin options and Style selector are a bit of a hindrance to the overall layout. Don't get me wrong -- I think the drop-in Style capability is fantastic-- but it just doesn't seem to play nice with the current 2ch page design.
The thing is, don't most or all major browsers these days allow users to change CSS styles from within the application itself? I know Firefox does, at least. Maybe the selector isn't really necessary.