hey everyone, i think this is what we want ^_^
I just finished watching Densha Otoko... and, being the otaku that I truly am, felt the urge to reach out. Granted, I have some great friends around campus, but some of the things I need to talk about I really can't bring up around them because I like one of them and I think he likes me too! ^_^
Yeah, I'm female and I have a horrible time with guys. out of the 21 boyfriends I've had, 16 have cheated on me... a staggering number.
So, I'm scarred for life. And now I'm in a situation where I like one of my friends....
Is anyone else in this thread right now? I could really use some advice from an unbiased person
>>38
If this is serious, you might want to check out http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1129793843/l50
It's no good asking serious relationship questions on here, we discuss nerdy geek issues here, The Society for the Study of Modern Image Board Culture.
>Yeah, I'm female and I have a horrible time with guys. out of the 21 boyfriends I've had, 16 have cheated on me... a staggering number.
Clearly there is something wrong with you.
...and she kept track of them.
guy leaves
"And that makes 21."
nah - I haven't slept with all of them. and, I've been tested. I was thinking there was something wrong with me, but my friends tell me that there's nothing wrong w/ me, but they have never been in a relationship with me. and it's not like I don't give... so...
but yeah, things are getting pretty serious with him.... he drove 45 minutes just to see me after work last night and then calls me first thing in the morning... why isn't he calling her?!
As we have already told you, this is the wrong board.
No, this board's fine.
Keep posting about it.
Make a chart of all the guys you've dated and look for common points. If it's not you, maybe it's what you're looking for.
Yeah. If you're a nice girl, perhaps it's only the assholes that want to go out with you, while the nice guys stay in the background.
I doubt you found 21 nice guys to date, since they're harder to find... but then again, maybe you want the assholes.
>but then again, maybe you want the assholes.
You know they're easier to have sex with, anyway.
If anyone ever reads this again, please go to this thread
http://4-ch.net/general/kareha.pl/1130119860
or this board.
http://4-ch.net/love/
bump
>>51
why do people do that?
why are you posting if you don't have anything to say?
//
>>51,53,55
probably same person.
this thread should probably be permasaged or closed.
This brings up an interesting point.
Should threads be automatically locked after a certain time?
No, they should not be. It's one of the main benefits of text boards over image boards - I can read anything from the date the site was created, and respond to it, if it's worth bumping.
It's a shame that you asked this question in such a shitty thread. I don't really want to bump it, but it is an idea worth discussing.
So why don't you start a new fucking thread if you feel it's "worth" discussing instead of hijacking some other thread and go off-topic. learn2sage tard.
You know, it's kind of funny. I was thinking about making a new thread with a link to these old posts. I had post typed up and everything, explaining what I was doing. I scrapped it, however, deciding that it made more sense to just use an existing thread.
Oh, you just can't please people.
Anyways, there is:
Now, if you'd like to put in your two cents on the topic, by all means go ahead. If you just want to whine about people reviving old threads, though, I think http://wakaba.c3.cx/soc/kareha.pl/1231630988/ would be a more worthy target.
Hey there, my name is Kaijestudio, I'm filipino current illustrator, I live in Tokyo, Japan. My blog is very cute.
> No reason to sage a thread that's on the top of the thread list
Actually there is a good reason to, in fact several. One being the link field already has 'sage' written in it because you always use sage anyway; another being maybe someone posted a new thread beforehand, which was mysteriously deleted (less plausible); or maybe you just don't want an ID attached to your post. There's plenty more reasons to sage the top thread, I'll let you think of them.
And this board isn't dead. >:|
Fair enough on the ID part, although I don't see the point, since your ID changes from thread to thread, IIRC.
If I can count the number of posts made in a week on one hand, the board is dead, especially when the majority of those posts are insubstantial. Maybe not as dead as some of the boards on 4-ch, but pretty close. It's a shame, too, with all of the interesting threads in its archives.
Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of a slow-paced BBS with large, provocative posts made somewhat regularly. The kind of board that I can check once at night, write up a few replies, then leave alone until the next night, where I'll come back to a few more serious or semi-serious posts. Unfortunately, The Society doesn't exactly measure up to that ideal, at the moment.
>>65
Perhaps you want to dissociate yourself from another post in the same thread.
I wasn't talking about the point of using sage to hide your ID in general. I was talking about why you, in particular, would hide your ID with sage, when you don't seem to have made any other posts in the thread.
If you're here, we might as talk about something else.
Should threads be automatically locked after a certain time?
Ah. Well no, I just don't bother clearing the link field.
On occasion I have found a rather old thread that I have had something to add to, so I would bump it. The alternative would be to start a new thread and make a point of mentioning the old thread, which makes the conversation feel disconnected and hard to follow.
I don't really see the practical benefit of locking threads after a time limit. If someone is bumping ancient threads with irrelevant garbage for the purpose of confusing the board, they should perhaps be banned. At the very least it ought to be possible to delete the last post in a thread and then move the thread back to where it was before the post was made, but I don't think there's any sane way to do that in Kareha, which really is a shame. (I suppose it could be done by parsing the last timestamp in every single thread, and then checking all the link fields for 'sage', but that's really ugly and far more effort than it really should be)
I also don't really see a point in locking threads after a post limit, for that matter. This would probably be more acceptable with a more database-oriented design, rather than flat files, which take longer to read the bigger they are. Maybe also impose a hard limit on the number of posts fetched at a given time from a thread -- e.g. maximum fetch of 1000 posts, which would more or less emulate Kareha's behavior of locking threads after that size. Then there'd be no need to do that [Part 6] on highly popular topics; it would be one logical thread which could be fetched in pieces as a "sliding window".