True. You reckon it's good to have everything as a category? I'm just a little worried about consistency, but that's more of a vague worry in my head than anything I could substantiate at the moment. I can already see that artists as a category is suitable. I suppose I can chuck everything in like that. I'm just worried things will get "messy" if it's not enforced the way it is at the moment. Ah, hell with it... means I have to get off my arse and make hierarchy (meta-categories as you called them) work. Still, no better time than the present. I was about to go and make characters "work".

This could be interesting, actually. Forming data chains whereby an entry can have a pointer to another entry. This sounds fun already! Rawr!

>>93 Haihai~, yeah, they're a pain in the arse as well. I've been thinking some fancy javascript sometime to tuck them away. My focus so far has been on compatibility, so we'll see how it goes (just because it's useless doesn't mean it shouldn't work in links, dammit!!).

>>95 Oh, you want XML now? Go on, I'm listening.