FORCED_ANONYMOUS (66)

1 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-02-24 16:57 ID:C9b4XHk7 (Replies) [Del]

Snacks dropped the bomb on /b/. Discuss!

2 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-24 17:39 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

I thought it was Shii.

Anyhow, as long as it spawns more activity, I am all for it.

I never cared much for the whole "attention whore" thing. Some were funny, some were not, as everything that goes through the holy digestion tract that is 4chan's /b/!

3 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-25 06:33 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

4 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-02-25 10:42 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

And now it's gone. That's pretty weak.

5 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-25 11:51 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

I heard it was just a test drive. Final decisions will probably be made public on the SUPERDUPERIMPORTANT IRC meeting today.

6 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-02-25 12:47 ID:7ejXpF4X (Replies) [Del]

You going? We should have somebody there to represent the interests of The Society! And who is better suited for the task than Anonymous?

7 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-25 13:03 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

> You going?

Nah.

8 Name: Mr VacBob!JqK7T7zan. 2005-02-26 01:04 ID:RcQeT4Uk (Replies) [Del]

I bravely predict that nobody asked us any useful questions, since almost all the submissions seem to be furries asking for furry boards where they post furry pictures of themselves fursuiting with furries.

9 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-26 02:03 ID:46oj7Gm9 (Replies) [Del]

>>5
Well, they didn't decide about FORCED_ANON.

>>6
I was there!

10 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-26 06:30 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

Well, transcripts and logs of the meeting are online. I just want to say this:

> ManOfWax is suggesting a no "camwhoring" rule.

You betrayed the glory of cracky-chan!

11 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-26 07:12 ID:Heaven (Replies) [Del]

My question about the official tracker of 4chan being on the officially-not-related-to-4chan site not4chan was ignored :(

12 Post deleted by moderator.

13 Name: Anonymous 2005-02-26 19:22 ID:Heaven [Del]

>>12

Sure thing, pedo associate

14 Name: Anonymous 2005-06-17 12:20 ID:6CpltP1F [Del]

They should reconsider getting rid of it IMHO.

15 Name: Mr VacBob!JqK7T7zan. 2005-06-17 22:35 ID:EwhYQ8gN [Del]

Getting rid of what?

16 Name: Anonymous 2005-06-18 00:08 ID:53rrdhIu [Del]

Of FORCED_ANON

Maybe it's just me, but lately I really found /b/ to be lacking of chaos.
Everything circles around Snack's latest bullshit, camwhores and other shit that reminds me too much of register-only forums.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: