The *chans - General Discussion Thread (255)

39 Name: Anonymous 2005-04-03 04:06 ID:rppqkJy3 [Del]

>>35

kiddychan would be no good because it would make it sound like it is distibuting kiddy porn and you talk like wakachan has no adult parts to it, why don't you click on that section that says "adult" and check some of the boards there and still tell me that it is "tame" or "childish" and besides that, do you mean to tell me that in order for an image board to be "redeaming" it has to have an excesive amount of porn on it?

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: