SITE MOVE (39)

1 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-15 22:31 ID:A1321jA4 [Del]

I've had it with this bullshit on 100webspace. The board is moving. It might take some time for the DNS to propagate, but when it's done, I'll post a reply to this thread.

2 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-15 16:45 ID:A1321jA4 [Del]

If you can see this, the DNS has propagated and everything should be OK.

Report any problems that might the move might have created.

Second, I now have a useless account at 100webspace, and I want to set up an image board there out of spite. I'm taking suggestions for the funniest way to waster their bandwidth.

3 Name: lolocaust!rsvcwx6Axc 2004-12-15 17:48 ID:Heaven [Del]

Guro is pretty funny to me.

4 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-15 19:07 ID:Heaven [Del]

http://paracelsus.hollosite.com/

IT'S THE WORST BOARD ON THE INTERNET

5 Name: Sling!myL1/SLing 2004-12-15 19:25 ID:Qy0PU0WV [Del]

>>4 Anything is okay to post there?

6 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-15 19:32 ID:A1321jA4 [Del]

I dunno, try not to break too many laws.

Also don't post any pictures of faces that aren't upside-down.

7 Name: Sling!myL1/SLing 2004-12-15 19:33 ID:Qy0PU0WV [Del]

The only law im aware of is about real child porn.
What other law is there?

8 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-16 13:14 ID:PwmrBQN2 [Del]

Update: 100webspace's banners are REALLY retarded. They strip out the <!DOCTYPE> and <html> tags, add their own mess at the top of the page, followed by your own code starting with the <head>.

Their code is not contained in any <body>, it's inserted before the real <head> and <body>, it uses tags like <center> that have been deprecated since HTML 3 or so, AND after removing the <!DOCTYPE> browsers will render it in quirks mode instead of standards compliance mode, possibly breaking it.

9 Name: Sling!myL1/SLing 2004-12-16 14:43 ID:X7zS9XWh [Del]

I just tried to post 4x:
SQL connection failure
SQL connection failure
SQL connection failure
SQL connection failure
@
@
@
orz

10 Name: Sling!myL1/SLing 2004-12-17 00:05 ID:X7zS9XWh [Del]

'k its working now

11 Name: hotaru!hoTarufiRE!!H0csnvz2 2004-12-17 01:23 ID:QjOh61hn [Del]

for anyone who's interested in a horrible ugly hack to get rid of 100webspace's banner...

<span style="display:none;">
<html><head>
</head></html>
</span>

12 Name: h-cube!h3/bEAAN16 2004-12-17 03:19 ID:/kwaCbxS [Del]

Hmm, how about:

<style type="text/css"> center {display:none} </style>

in your <head> section ?

13 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-17 12:06 ID:khYyHb86 [Del]

I like these. I was thinking of putting in some Javascript that drops the first element from the DOM, but these work too. >>12 is especially tasty.

Would <!-- <html><head></head></html> --> work?

14 Name: Anonymous 2004-12-17 12:47 ID:yBAM344l [Del]

>>13
unfortunately their server is smart enough not to put the banner in a comment, so that won't work... >>11 and >>12 both work, but don't fix the fact that it's not correct xhtml or html...

15 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-17 16:29 ID:khYyHb86 [Del]

How about this?

<![CDATA[ > <html><head></head></html> ]]>

16 Name: hotaru!hoTarufiRE!!H0csnvz2 2004-12-18 01:11 ID:KbMg22fk [Del]

partition to add an <justignorethisshit> tag to xhtml

17 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-18 07:55 ID:khYyHb86 [Del]

Actually, that's what <![CDATA[ ]]> is.

18 Name: hotaru!hoTarufiRE!!H0csnvz2 2004-12-18 23:14 ID:hY/xpsvf [Del]

>>17
except that the w3c validator complains about it, so it's not really ignoring it...

19 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-19 08:10 ID:yt2599pw [Del]

Well, <![CDATA[ ]]> is only valid in XML, so the page has to be valid XHTML for it to be accepted. Which is kind of TRICKY when the bloody server strips out the doctype... sigh.

20 Name: hotaru!hoTarufiRE!!H0csnvz2 2004-12-21 00:56 ID:y6SURsTX [Del]

>>19
the server doesn't strip out the doctype ( http://hotaru.freelinuxhost.com/ )...

21 Name: Shii Style!!TnUFplD7 2004-12-23 15:10 ID:AsLzIjSJ [Del]

<![IGNORE[ blah ]]> works in HTML 4.01 as well as XHTML, as far as I know.

Why are you using XHTML anyway? It's parsed as HTML 4.01 unless if you're sending it as application/xml+xhtml, which breaks IE.

22 Name: hotaru!hoTarufiRE!!H0csnvz2 2004-12-24 01:47 ID:bEUPJujk [Del]

>Why are you using XHTML anyway?

because i want to.

>It's parsed as HTML 4.01 unless if you're sending it as application/xml+xhtml,

it should be parsed as XHTML, since that's what the doctype says it is.

>which breaks IE.

IE is already broken.

anyway... i did get it to validate (now as XHTML 1.1) using <![IGNORE[ ]]>, but the css validator apparently doesn't like it...
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhotaru.freelinuxhost.com%2F
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhotaru.freelinuxhost.com%2F

23 Name: Shii Style!!TnUFplD7 2004-12-24 16:27 ID:x8q+mafv [Del]

> it should be parsed as XHTML, since that's what the doctype says it is.

Firefox says: text/html

24 Name: Shii Style!!TnUFplD7 2004-12-24 16:29 ID:x8q+mafv [Del]

And you shouldn't be sending XHTML as text/html, c.f.

http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml

25 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-24 19:16 ID:9UTpc7mR [Del]

And you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet. Writing XHTML and sending it as text/html is a good way to maximize compatibility both with new and old browsers - old browsers can read XHTML 1.0 Transistional just fine, and newer, limited browsers that can only read XHTML work just fine too.

Now, sending any other version than XHTML 1.0 Transitional as text/html is technically not standards-compliant, but 1.0 Transitional is specifically designed for backwards and forwards compatibility. This essay boils down to two things:

  • Sending XHTML as text/html makes browsers use a non-XML parser, not warning you of markup errors. This is only a problem if you never validate your XHTML, and does not affect the user at all.
  • XHTML 1.0 Transitional syntax is not valid HTML 4.0 as an SGML parsers sees it. Technically true, but entirely academic as no current browsers use an SGML parser.

In summary: 100% wankery. In an ideal world we'd all be sending XHTML 2.0 with correct mime types and browsers would handle it perfectly. Sadly, we live in the real world and do whatever works best. So we send XHTML 1.0 Transitional as text/html, and it works everywhere, because browsers are built to handle this.

26 Name: Shii Style!!TnUFplD7 2004-12-29 22:10 ID:ekOjleAu [Del]

> no current browsers use an SGML parser.

emacs-w3

27 Name: Shii Style!!TnUFplD7 2004-12-30 09:06 ID:ttXeolLd [Del]

28 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2004-12-30 10:24 ID:Ezjwq2RK [Del]

>>27

Nobody seems to care about that bug, and it probably never will get implemented since it would break lots of pages, exactly because of XHTML. And nobody uses shorttags anyway, because they're not supported.

29 Name: 100WBankiller 2005-04-04 20:52 ID:YcV3HGXv [Del]

maybe this could help ;)

this.ie5=(this.ver.indexOf("MSIE 5")>-1 && this.dom)?1:0; this.ie4=(document.all && !this.dom)?1:0; this.ns5=(this.dom && parseInt(this.ver) >= 5) ?1:0; this.ns4=(document.layers && !this.dom)?1:0; this.bw=(this.ie5 || this.ie4 || this.ns4 || this.ns5); return this; } //------------------------------------------------- function check_banner(){ var bw = new check_browser(); var PageWidth = (bw.ns4 || bw.ns5) ? innerWidth : document.body.offsetWidth - 20; var PageHeight = (bw.ns4 || bw.ns5) ? innerHeight : document.body.offsetHeight - 20; if (parent && (PageWidth < 300 || PageHeight < 200)) { var el = document.getElementById('1217655414'); el.style.display = "none"; } } //------------------------------------------------- function banner_links_sh(isc){ var el = document.getElementById('banner_links'); if(el.style.display=='none') el.style.display = 'block'; else{ if(!isc) return true; el.style.display = 'none'; } return true; } //------------------------------------------------- function google_ad_request_done(google_ads) { if (google_ads.length < 1 ) return; var colspana = (google_ads.length<3)?3:google_ads.length; document.write(""); document.write(""); if (google_ads[0].type == 'text') { for(i = 0; i < google_ads.length; ++i) { document.write(""); } */ document.write(""); } if (google_ads[0].type == 'image') { document.write(""); } document.write ("
"); if (google_info.feedback_url) { document.write("Ads by Google"); } else { document.write("Ads By Google"); } document.write("
" + ""+ "
" + google_ads[i].line1 + "
" + "
"+google_ads[i].line2 + "
" + google_ads[i].line3 + "
" + "" + google_ads[i].visible_url + "
"); } /* if(google_ads.length < 3 ){ document.write("
"+ ""+ "
"+ ""+ "Google"+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ ""+ "
"+ "
" + "" + "
"); } //------------------------------------------------- function ss(w,id) {window.status = w;return true;} //------------------------------------------------- function cs(){window.status='';} //------------------------------------------------- function ca(a) {top.location.href=document.getElementById(a).href;} //------------------------------------------------- function ga(o,e) {if (document.getElementById) {a=o.id.substring(1);p = "";r = "";g = e.target;if (g) {t = g.id;f = g.parentNode;if (f) {p = f.id;h = f.parentNode;if (h)r = h.id;}}else {h = e.srcElement;f = h.parentNode;if (f) p = f.id;t = h.id;}if (t==a || p==a || r==a)return true;top.location.href=document.getElementById(a).href;}} //------------------------------------------------- window.onload = check_banner; -->

30 Post deleted by moderator.

31 Name: Anonymous 2005-09-28 09:49 ID:Heaven [Del]

y halo thar mister spambot

32 Name: Anonymous 2005-09-28 10:21 ID:Heaven [Del]

added

33 Post deleted by moderator.

34 Post deleted by moderator.

35 Name: !WAHa.06x36 : 2005-12-09 05:17 ID:Heaven [Del]

Ok, this "WebWarper" thing, whatever it is, is now banned.

36 Name: Anonymous : 2005-12-09 07:06 ID:8p315lZY [Del]

37 Post deleted by moderator.

38 Post deleted by moderator.

39 Post deleted by moderator.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: